Astronics Electronic Systems Corp v. MAGicALL Inc
| Astronics Electronic System Corp. |
| MAGicALL, Inc. |
| Astronics Electronic Systems Corp |
| MAGicALL Inc |
| 2:2022cv00729 |
| May 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Thomas S Zilly |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Motion to Confirm Arbitration |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 REPLY, filed by Respondent MAGicALL Inc, TO RESPONSE to #5 Cross-MOTION to Vacate Arbitration Award. (Attachments: #1 Receipt of Filing via Email) (Filing received via email 06/24/2022, during CM/ECF outage) (MW) |
| Filing 15 REPLY, filed by Petitioner Astronics Electronic Systems Corp, TO RESPONSE to #1 MOTION to Confirm Arbitration Award (Attachments: #1 Receipt of filing via email) (LH) (Filing received via email 06/24/2022, during CM/ECF outage) |
| Filing 14 DECLARATION of James H. Bicks filed by Petitioner Astronics Electronic Systems Corp re #5 MOTION to Vacate, re #1 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award (Goldmark, John) Modified to add link to Petition on 6/21/2022 (MW). |
| Filing 13 REPLY, filed by Petitioner Astronics Electronic Systems Corp, TO RESPONSE to #5 MOTION to Vacate, re #1 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award (Goldmark, John) Modified to add link to Petition on 6/21/2022 (MW). |
Filing 12
ORDER re #8 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney James H Bicks for Petitioner Astronics Electronic Systems Corp by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d). (JWC)
|
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER: Petitioner's motion to confirm arbitration award, docket no. #1 , is RENOTED to 6/24/2022, and will be considered in conjunction with Respondent's cross-motion to vacate the arbitration award, docket no. #5 . The Court hereby STRIKES the Rule 26(f) conference, initial disclosure, and combined joint status report and discovery plan deadlines. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (MW)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Benjamin J Hodges on behalf of Respondent MAGicALL Inc. (Hodges, Benjamin) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER re #7 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney David Norman-Schiff for Petitioner Astronics Electronic Systems Corp by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d). (JWC)
|
| Attorneys Devra R Cohen, Audrey C Chambers, Kelly Ann Mennemeier added for MAGicALL Inc; per #10 Notice of Appearance. (MW) |
| Filing 8 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY James H. Bicks FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Petitioner Astronics Electronic Systems Corp (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7583520 (Goldmark, John) |
| Filing 7 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY David Norman-Schiff FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Petitioner Astronics Electronic Systems Corp (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7583509 (Goldmark, John) |
| Attorney Benjamin J Hodges added for MAGicALL Inc; per #5 Response to Petition, and MOTION to Vacate. (MW) |
| Noting Date Set/Reset re #5 Response to Petition, and MOTION to Vacate Arbitration Award: Noting Date 6/24/2022. (MW) |
| Filing 6 DECLARATION of Benjamin Hodges re #5 Brief - Reply, by Respondent MAGicALL Inc (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit Exhibit 10)(Hodges, Benjamin) |
| Filing 5 RESPONSE REPLY BRIEF to AES's Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award & Cross-Motion to Vacate the Arbitration Award re #1 Petition (Other) by Respondent MAGicALL Inc. Oral Argument Requested. Noting Date 6/24/2022 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hodges, Benjamin) Modified to add Motion event on 6/7/2022 (MW). |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. Joint Status Report due by 8/1/2022, FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 7/18/2022, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 8/1/2022, (FMR)
|
| Judge Thomas S. Zilly added. (JWC) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Astronics Corp. for Astronics Electronic System Corp.. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Astronics Electronic System Corp. (Goldmark, John) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION of James H. Bicks re #1 Petition (Other) by Plaintiff Astronics Electronic System Corp. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Exhibit Q, #18 Exhibit R)(Goldmark, John) |
| Filing 1 PETITION and Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award (Receipt # AWAWDC-7569970), filed by Astronics Electronic System Corp. Noting Date 6/24/2022 (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Order)(Goldmark, John) Modified on 6/9/2022 (MW). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
