Brown v. King County Superior Court
| Maurice Anthony Brown |
| King County Superior Court |
| 2:2022cv00761 |
| June 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| David W Christel |
| Lauren King |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER TO CORRECT DEFICIENCY: Petitioner shall re-file a complete petition, naming a proper respondent, on or before August 19, 2022. If petitioner fails to file a complete petition or to respond to this Order, the undersigned will recommend dismissal of this action without prejudice. Signed by Judge David W. Christel. (Attachments: #1 2254 Habeas Petition Form (blank))**18 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Maurice Brown, Prisoner ID: 359167)(SP- cc: petitioner w/2254 Form)
|
| Filing 7 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Maurice Anthony Brown. (IFP Granted) **79 PAGE(S), PRINT NEF ONLY**(Maurice Brown, Prisoner ID: 359167)(SP) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER Granting #1 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Judge David W. Christel. (cc: DOC) **1 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Maurice Brown, Prisoner ID: 359167)(SP)
|
| Response to #8 Order to Correct Deficiency due by 8/19/2022. **DO NOT PRINT**(Maurice Brown, Prisoner ID: 359167)(SP) |
| *** #2 Notice of Filing Deficiency terminated. **0 PAGE(S), PRINT NEF ONLY**(Maurice Brown, Prisoner ID: 359167)(SP) |
| Filing 5 PRAECIPE to attach (Signature Page) re #1 -1 Proposed Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Petitioner Maurice Anthony Brown. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT NEF ONLY**(Maurice Brown, Prisoner ID: 359167)(SP) |
| Filing 4 Prison Trust Account Statement, filed by Petitioner Maurice Anthony Brown. **1 PAGE(S), PRINT NEF ONLY**(Maurice Brown, Prisoner ID: 359167)(SP) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Application. ***Action Required*** Prison Trust Account Statement, Unsigned Complaint/Petition.See attached letter for more information and instructions. Filer has until 7/5/2022 to correct IFP application. (Attachments: #1 Habeas Petition Signature Page) **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Maurice Brown, Prisoner ID: 359167)(SP) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Petitioner Maurice Anthony Brown. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Petition for Writ Of Habeas Corpus)**82 PAGE(S), PRINT NEF ONLY**(Maurice Brown, Prisoner ID: 359167)(SP) (Main Document 1 replaced on 6/3/2022) (SP). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brown v. King County Superior Court | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Maurice Anthony Brown | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: King County Superior Court | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
