VanDerHeyden v. ADT Commercial LLC
| Brian VanDerHeyden and ADT Commercial, LLC |
| ADT Commercial LLC |
| 2:2022cv01024 |
| July 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tana Lin |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent ADT Inc. for ADT Commercial LLC. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by ADT Commercial LLC (Morisset, Catharine) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by ADT Commercial LLC.(Morisset, Catharine) |
Filing 14
ORDER re Parties' #13 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. Defendants deadline to file an answer is extended to 9/13/2022. Signed by Judge Tana Lin. (LH)
|
| Filing 13 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, , filed by Defendant ADT Commercial LLC. Noting Date 9/6/2022, (Morisset, Catharine) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT by Judge Tana Lin. FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 9/27/2022, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 10/11/2022, Joint Status Report due by 10/25/2022. (KMP)
|
|
Filing 11
STIPULATION AND ORDER re Parties' #10 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. Defendants' deadline 15 to file a responsive pleading is extended to 9/6/2022. Signed by Judge Tana Lin. (LH)
|
| Filing 10 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , filed by Defendant ADT Commercial LLC. Noting Date 8/22/2022, (Morisset, Catharine) |
| Attorney Ryan R Jones added for ADT Commercial LLC per #9 Notice of Appearance. (LH) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Catharine M Morisset on behalf of Defendant ADT Commercial LLC. (Morisset, Catharine) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER (text only) made at the direction of Judge Tana Lin: The Court has posted Chambers Procedures at http://www.wawd.uscourts.gov/judges/lin-procedures. All counsel and unrepresented ("pro se") parties are DIRECTED to review them, if they have not already done so. Failure to follow the requirements set forth in the Chambers Procedures may result in the imposition of sanctions. (KMP) |
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER REGARDING 28 U.S.C. 455 AND CANON 3 OF THE CODE OF CONDUCT FOR UNITED STATES JUDGES by Judge Tana Lin. (KMP)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Robert Joseph Cadranell, II on behalf of Plaintiff Brian VanDerHeyden. (Cadranell, Robert) |
| Filing 5 DEMAND for JURY TRIAL by Plaintiff Brian VanDerHeyden (McGlothin, Dennis) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Complaint. ***Action Required*** Improper Signature - Secondary Attorney(s), Jury Demand Improperly Indicated.See attached letter for more information and instructions. (JWC) |
| Filing 3 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) ADT Commercial LLC (JWC) |
| Filing 2 PRAECIPE TO ISSUE SUMMONS re #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Brian VanDerHeyden (Attachments: #1 Summons)(McGlothin, Dennis) |
| Judge Tana Lin added. (JWC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) ADT Commercial, LLC with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # AWAWDC-7638529) Attorney Dennis J. McGlothin added to party Brian VanDerHeyden(pty:pla), filed by Brian VanDerHeyden. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(McGlothin, Dennis) Modified on 7/25/2022 to strike improper jury demand (JWC). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
