ZYF Marketing LLC v. Loyalmobs Incorporated et al
| ZYF Marketing LLC Washington limited liability company doing business as ZipYourFlyer.com and ZYF Marketing LLC a Washington limited liability company doing business as ZipYourFlyer.com |
| Loyalmobs Incorporated a California corporation doing business as MondoFlyers, Pardner Wynn and Dave Mandelkern |
| 2:2022cv01055 |
| July 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Richard A Jones |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Reset Deadlines: Upon the joint request of the parties, the following deadline are reset: Initial Disclosure Deadline is 9/27/2022, Joint Status Report due by 10/4/2022. (VE) |
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER (text only) granting #11 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and for good cause shown, the time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended up to and through 9/29/2022. Authorized by Judge Richard A. Jones. (VE)
|
| Filing 12 ACCEPTANCE AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on Loyalmobs Incorporated, dba MondoFlyers; Pardner Wynn; and Dave Mandelkern on 8/30/2022, filed by Plaintiff ZYF Marketing LLC. (Shewmake, Thomas) Modified on 8/30/2022 to edit title (SR). |
| Filing 11 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, filed by Defendants Loyalmobs Incorporated, Dave Mandelkern, Pardner Wynn. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 8/30/2022, (Keyes, J) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER REGARDING FRCP 26(f) CONFERENCE, INITIAL DISCLOSURES, AND JOINT STATUS REPORT. FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 9/13/2022, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 9/20/2022, Joint Status Report due by 9/27/2022, by Judge Richard A. Jones. (VE)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney J Michael Keyes on behalf of Defendants Loyalmobs Incorporated, Dave Mandelkern, Pardner Wynn. (Keyes, J) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Action in Central District of California, Southern Division, Santa Ana, case number(s) in other court 8:22-cv-01136-JVS-ADS ; filed by Plaintiff ZYF Marketing LLC. (Shewmake, Thomas) |
| Filing 7 STANDING ORDER for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Richard A. Jones. (VE) |
| Filing 6 ** Reminder ** Documents omitted re #1 Complaint. Notice of Pendency of Other Action.See attached letter for more information and instructions. (JWC) |
| Filing 5 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action. Mailed to the US Copyright Office (JWC) |
| Filing 4 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action. Emailed to the US Patent Office (JWC) |
| Filing 3 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Loyalmobs Incorporated, Dave Mandelkern, Pardner Wynn (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons) (JWC) |
| Judge Richard A. Jones added. (JWC) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by ZYF Marketing LLC (Shewmake, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # AWAWDC-7646920), filed by ZYF Marketing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons Loyalmobs Inc, #6 Summons Mandelkern, #7 Summons Wynn, #8 Report on Copyrights (AO Form 121), #9 Report on Patents and Trademarks (AO Form 120))(Shewmake, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
