Spencer v. Starbucks Corporation
| Richard Spencer |
| Starbucks Corporation |
| 2:2022cv01123 |
| August 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| John C Coughenour |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Theo A Lesczynski on behalf of Defendant Starbucks Corporation. (Lesczynski, Theo) |
| Filing 17 MINUTE ENTRY SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT DATES All counsel and any pro se parties are directed to meet and confer and to provide the Court with a combined Joint Status Report (the Report) by the deadline set below. This meet-and-confer must be a face-to-face meeting or a telephonic conference. If the parties are unable to agree on any part of the Report, they may answer in separate paragraphs; no separate reports are to be filed. The Report must contain the following information: 1. An estimate of the number of days needed for trial; 2. The date by which the case will be ready for trial; and 3. Whether the parties intend to mediate per LCR 39.1 and, if so, when the parties expect to complete mediation.The deadlines below may be extended only by court order. Any request for extension of these deadlines should be made by email to Courtroom Deputy Clerk Kadya Peter at kadya_peter@wawd.uscourts.gov. The parties who have appeared in this matter must meet and confer before contacting the Court to request an extension. If this case involves claims that are exempt from the requirements of FRCP 26(a) and 26(f), please notify the Courtroom Deputy Clerk. Please note: Initial Disclosures are not to be filed. FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 11/10/2022, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 11/17/2022, Joint Status Report due by 11/25/2022. (KMP) |
Filing 16
ORDER granting Parties' #15 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. The deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to 10/18/2022. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (SR)
|
| Filing 15 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , filed by Defendant Starbucks Corporation. Noting Date 9/23/2022, (Payson, Kenneth) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER granting Parties' #13 Stipulated MOTION EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. The deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint should be extended to 9/27/2022. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (SR)
|
| Filing 13 Stipulated MOTION EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, filed by Defendant Starbucks Corporation. Noting Date 9/1/2022, (Payson, Kenneth) |
| Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Starbucks Corporation (Payson, Kenneth) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Kenneth E Payson on behalf of Defendant Starbucks Corporation. (Payson, Kenneth) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER re #7 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Matthew A Girardi for Plaintiff Richard Spencer by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d). (JWC)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER re #8 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Philip L Fraietta for Plaintiff Richard Spencer by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d). (JWC)
|
| Filing 8 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Philip L. Fraietta FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Richard Spencer (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7681892 (Noel, Wright) |
| Filing 7 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Matthew A. Girardi FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Richard Spencer (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7681861 (Noel, Wright) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER re #5 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Julian C Diamond for Plaintiff Richard Spencer by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d). (JWC)
|
| Filing 5 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Julian C. Diamond FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Richard Spencer (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7681413 (Noel, Wright) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on Starbucks Corporation on 8/16/2022, filed by Plaintiff Richard Spencer. (Noel, Wright) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY AND DEPOSITIONS by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (GT)
|
| Filing 2 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Starbucks Corporation (ST) |
| U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour added. (ST) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Richard Spencer Starbucks Corporation with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # CWAWDC-7661641), filed by Richard Spencer. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Noel, Wright) Modified on 8/11/2022 to correct Defendant (JF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
