Tafoya v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Joseph Tafoya |
| Social Security Administration Commissioner and Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 2:2022cv01146 |
| August 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Mary Alice Theiler |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Edmund John Darcher on behalf of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Darcher, Edmund) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on Commissioner of the Social Security Administration on 8/30/2022, filed by Plaintiff Joseph Tafoya. (Dellert, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Commissioner of Social Security. (RE) |
| Filing 2 CONSENT by all parties to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. Case remains assigned to Hon. Mary Alice Theiler. (TF) |
| Hon. Mary Alice Theiler added. (RE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Social Security Administration Commissioner (Receipt # AWAWDC-7665926) Attorney Christopher H Dellert added to party Joseph Tafoya(pty:pla), filed by Joseph Tafoya. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Dellert, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
