Davis v. King County Library et al
| Eugene Davis |
| King County Library, Fred Gurney and Jane Does |
| 2:2022cv01169 |
| August 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Richard A Jones |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Summons(es) Issued in Paper Form as to defendant(s) King County Library. (SR) |
| Filing 7 STANDING ORDER for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Richard A. Jones. (cc: Plaintiff via US Mail) (VE) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Court-Appointed Counsel, filed by Plaintiff Eugene Davis. Noting Date 9/9/2022. (SR) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Receipt # IFP Granted), filed by Eugene Davis.(SR) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting Plaintiff's #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson. (SR) (cc: Plaintiff via U.S. mail)
|
| Filing 3 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment. (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) (JWC) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Eugene Davis. (Attachments: #1 PROPOSED Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 PROPOSED Application for Court-Appointed Counsel) (Case assignment sheet given to Plaintiff at intake window) (JWC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
