In re: Sailed Technology (Beijing) Co Ltd et al
Petitioner: Sailed Technology (Beijing) Co Ltd
In Re: Amazon.com Inc and Amazon.com Services LLC
Case Number: 2:2022cv01396
Filed: September 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Seattle Office
Presiding Judge: John H Chun
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 31 REPLY, filed by Petitioner Sailed Technology (Beijing) Co Ltd, TO RESPONSE to #25 MOTION for U.S. Discovery for Use in Foreign Proceedings Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 (Bremer, Carmen)
October 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER re #21 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney James Canfield for Petitioner Sailed Technology (Beijing) Co Ltd, by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(CDA)
October 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 29 CORRECTED RESPONSE, by In Re Amazon.com Inc, Amazon.com Services LLC, to #25 MOTION for U.S. Discovery for Use in Foreign Proceedings Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 . (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Dr. Johnson Wang in Support of Amazon's Opposition, #2 Exhibit A)(Ware, Jeffrey) Modified on 10/18/2022 to indicate corrected document (SB).
October 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 28 RESPONSE, by In Re Amazon.com Inc, Amazon.com Services LLC, to #25 MOTION for U.S. Discovery for Use in Foreign Proceedings Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 . (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Dr. Johnson Wang in Support of Amazon's Opposition, #2 Exhibit A)(Ware, Jeffrey)
October 11, 2022 Opinion or Order ***Motion terminated as moot at the direction of chambers: #9 MOTION to Deny Sailed Technologys Request for Ex Parte Application Under 28 U.S.C. 1782, and Request for Standard Briefing Schedule re #1 Notice-Other, Ex Parte Application of Sailed Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd filed by Amazon.com Services LLC, Amazon.com Inc. (AD)
October 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER re #22 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney James Klaiber for Petitioner Sailed Technology (Beijing) Co Ltd by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d). (JWC)
October 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER re #23 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Lynn M Russo for Petitioner Sailed Technology (Beijing) Co Ltd by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d). (JWC)
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MOTION for U.S. Discovery for Use in Foreign Proceedings Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 , filed by Petitioner Sailed Technology (Beijing) Co Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration of Lynn M. Russo with Exhs. 1-6, #2 Exhibit Declaration of Weiqiang Hou with Exhs. 1-5, #3 Proposed Order) Noting Date 10/21/2022, (Bremer, Carmen)
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER re #20 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Emma L Baratta for Petitioner Sailed Technology (Beijing) Co Ltd by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d). (JWC)
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 23 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Lynn M. Russo FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Petitioner Sailed Technology (Beijing) Co Ltd (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7730193 (Bremer, Carmen)
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY James R. Klaiber FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Petitioner Sailed Technology (Beijing) Co Ltd (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7730188 (Bremer, Carmen)
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY James Canfield FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Petitioner Sailed Technology (Beijing) Co Ltd (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7730182 (Bremer, Carmen)
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Emma L. Baratta FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Petitioner Sailed Technology (Beijing) Co Ltd (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7730156 (Bremer, Carmen)
October 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Carmen E. Bremer on behalf of Petitioner Sailed Technology (Beijing) Co Ltd. (Bremer, Carmen)
September 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER re #14 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Matthew B Becker for Amazon.com Inc and Amazon.com Services LLC by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d). (JWC)
September 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER re #13 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Todd R Gregorian for Amazon.com Inc and Amazon.com Services LLC by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d). (JWC)
September 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER re #12 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Ravi Ranganath for Amazon.com Inc and Amazon.com Services LLC by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d). (JWC)
September 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Case Reassigned to Judge John H. Chun. Judge Lauren King no longer assigned to the case. (RE)
September 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER re #1 Application, #9 MOTION to Deny Sailed Technologys Request for Ex Parte Application Under 28 U.S.C. 1782, and Request for Standard Briefing Schedule re #1 Notice-Other, Ex Parte Application of Sailed Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd filed by Amazon.com Services LLC, Amazon.com Inc. On September 16, 2022, Sailed Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. filed an Ex Parte Application for U.S. Discovery for Use in Foreign Proceedings Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782. Dkt. # 1. The targets of the proposed subpoenas have opposed the application. Dkt. # 9. In light of the contested nature of this proceeding, the Clerk of Court is directed to assign a civil action number signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (cc via ad hoc atty James Boykin) (RE)
September 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Matthew B. Becker FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for In Re Amazon.com Inc, Amazon.com Services LLC (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7720577 (Ware, Jeffrey)
September 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Todd R. Gregorian FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for In Re Amazon.com Inc, Amazon.com Services LLC (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7720560 (Ware, Jeffrey)
September 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Ravi R. Ranganath FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for In Re Amazon.com Inc, Amazon.com Services LLC (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7720543 (Ware, Jeffrey)
September 29, 2022 Opinion or Order MINUTE ENTRY: Pursuant to Amazon's objection to Petitioner's Application in case number 2:22-mc-00074-RSL, and the Court's order to assign a new civil case number, the case has been randomly assigned to Judge John H. Chun Judge Lauren King, case number 2:22-cv-01396-JHC. All future pleadings must now bear the newly assigned case number. (cc via ad hoc atty James Boykin) (RE) Modified on 9/30/2022 to edit assigned judge info. (RE)
September 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Jeffrey A. Ware on behalf of In Re Amazon.com Inc, Amazon.com Services LLC. (Ware, Jeffrey)
September 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Amazon.com Inc, Amazon.com Services LLC (Ware, Jeffrey)
September 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION to Deny Sailed Technologys Request for Ex Parte Application Under 28 U.S.C. 1782, and Request for Standard Briefing Schedule re #1 Notice-Other, Ex Parte Application of Sailed Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd, filed by In Re Amazon.com Inc, Amazon.com Services LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 10/14/2022, (Ware, Jeffrey)
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 LETTER from Clerk to counsel re receipt of case from Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (RE)
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Case transferred in from Eastern District of Virginia, (Alexandria), Case Number 1:22-mc-00024-LMB-WEF.
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Judge Robert S. Lasnik added. (RE)
September 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDERED that the Ex Parte Application [Dkt. No. 1] be and is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 9/20/2022. (show) [Transferred from vaed on 9/22/2022.]
September 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Declaration re #1 Civil Miscellaneous Case, [Corrected] Declaration of Lynn Russo in Support of Application for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1782 by Sailed Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7)(Boykin, James) [Transferred from vaed on 9/22/2022.]
September 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Sailed Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.. (Boykin, James) [Transferred from vaed on 9/22/2022.]
September 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Case Reassigned to District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema and Magistrate Judge William E. Fitzpatrick. (jlan) [Transferred from vaed on 9/22/2022.]
September 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Declaration re #1 Civil Miscellaneous Case, Declaration of Lynn Russo in Support of Application for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1782 by Sailed Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7)(Boykin, James) [Transferred from vaed on 9/22/2022.]
September 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Declaration re #1 Civil Miscellaneous Case, Declaration of Weiqiang in Support of Application for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1782 by Sailed Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(Boykin, James) [Transferred from vaed on 9/22/2022.]
September 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Ex Parte Application of Sailed Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd ( Filing fee $ 49, receipt number AVAEDC-8573313.), filed by Sailed Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Boykin, James) Modified docket text on 9/21/2022 (show). [Transferred from vaed on 9/22/2022.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In re: Sailed Technology (Beijing) Co Ltd et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Sailed Technology (Beijing) Co Ltd
Represented By: James Hodo Boykin, III
Represented By: PRO HAC VICE PENDING
Represented By: Emma L Baratta
Represented By: James Canfield
Represented By: James Klaiber
Represented By: Lynn M Russo
Represented By: Carmen E. Bremer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
In re: Amazon.com Inc
Represented By: Matthew B Becker
Represented By: Ravi Ranganath
Represented By: Todd R Gregorian
Represented By: Jeffrey A. Ware
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
In re: Amazon.com Services LLC
Represented By: Matthew B Becker
Represented By: Ravi Ranganath
Represented By: Todd R Gregorian
Represented By: Jeffrey A. Ware
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?