Yates v. Northwest Barricade & Signs
Emily Yates |
Northwest Barricade & Signs and Northwest Flagging |
2:2022cv01518 |
October 25, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
John H Chun |
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 JOINT STATUS REPORT signed by all parties. Estimated Trial Days: 5. (Rathbone, Mary) |
Filing 7 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to All Defendants. (SB) |
Filing 6 PRAECIPE TO ISSUE SUMMONS re #5 Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Emily Yates (Rathbone, Mary) |
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND, filed by Emily Yates.(Rathbone, Mary) |
![]() |
Attorneys Matthew J Macario, Jeremy F. Wood added for Northwest Barricade & Signs per the filing of Defendant's #3 Notice of Appearance. (SB) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Suzanne Kelly Michael on behalf of Defendant Northwest Barricade & Signs. (Michael, Suzanne) |
Filing 2 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Northwest Barricade & Signs (JWC) |
Judge John H. Chun added. (JWC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Northwest Barricade & Signs with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # AWAWDC-7752725), filed by Emily Yates. (Attachments: #1 Summons to Northwest Barricade & Signs, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rathbone, Mary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.