Jones v. City of Seattle et al
| Monica Jones |
| City of Seattle, Seattle City Light, Debra Smith, John Doe Smith, Marcus Jackson, Jane Doe Jackson, Luis Amezcua, Jane Doe Amezcua, John Doe Cromwell and Jane Doe Cromwell |
| 2:2022cv01668 |
| November 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Richard A Jones |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 STANDING ORDER for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Richard A. Jones. (VE) |
| Filing 4 DEMAND for JURY TRIAL by Plaintiff Monica Jones (Currie, Vicky) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Complaint,. ***Action Required*** Jury Demand Improperly Indicated.See attached letter for more information and instructions. (MJV) |
| Filing 2 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Jane Doe Amezcua, Luis Amezcua, City of Seattle, Jane Doe Cromwell, John Doe Cromwell, Jane Doe Jackson, Marcus Jackson, Seattle City Light, Debra Smith, John Doe Smith (MJV) |
| Judge Richard A. Jones added. (MJV) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # AWAWDC-7787834) Attorney Vicky J Currie added to party Monica Jones(pty:pla), filed by Monica Jones. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons)(Currie, Vicky) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
