Jatta v. Garland et al
| SARJO JATTA |
| Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou, Anne Arries Corsano, USCIS, United States Department of Homeland Security and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services |
| 2:2022cv01748 |
| December 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Thomas S Zilly |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER granting Parties' #7 Stipulated MOTION to Hold Case in Abeyance. This case is held in abeyance until 4/28/2023. The Court's order (Dkt. No. #5 ) directing the parties to submit a Joint Status Report by 2/13/2023 is vacated. The parties shall file a joint status report on or before 6/30/2023. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SB)
|
| Filing 7 Stipulated MOTION to Hold Case in Abeyance and [Proposed] Order, filed by Defendants Anne Arries Corsano, Merrick Garland, Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security. Noting Date 1/25/2023, (Lambert, Michelle) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Michelle R. Lambert on behalf of Defendants Anne Arries Corsano, Merrick Garland, Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security. (Lambert, Michelle) |
|
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER: Counsel are directed to confer and to file a Joint Status Report by Monday, 2/13/2023. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to serve copies of this Minute Order on all parties who appear after this Minute Order is filed, within fourteen (14) days of receipt of service of each appearance. Plaintiff's counsel will be responsible for starting the communications needed to comply with this Minute Order.Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SR)
|
| Filing 4 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Anne Arries Corsano, Merrick Garland, Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons) (JWC) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER re #2 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Benjamin Baumgartner for Plaintiff Sarjo Jatta by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d). (JWC)
|
| Judge Thomas S. Zilly added. (JWC) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Benjamin Baumgartner FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff SARJO JATTA (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7809518 (Tanijo, Steve) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Receipt # AWAWDC-7809486) Attorney Steve Tanijo added to party SARJO JATTA(pty:pla), filed by SARJO JATTA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover, #2 Summons Summons Corsano, #3 Summons Summons DHS, #4 Summons Summons Garland, #5 Summons Summons Jaddou, #6 Summons Summons Mayorkas, #7 Summons Summons USCIS, #8 Exhibit Ex A, #9 Exhibit Ex B)(Tanijo, Steve) (Attachment 1 replaced on 12/13/2022 due to malformed PDF) (CDA). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
