Anderson v. Adcom Group Inc et al
| Mychel Anderson |
| Adcom Group Inc., Richard Hunt and Adcom Group Inc |
| 2:2022cv01762 |
| December 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| John H Chun |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION by parties (Rocke, Aaron) |
| Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER (text-only) entered upon the authority of Judge John H. Chun. Upon the request and agreement of the parties, and for good cause shown, the Joint Status Report deadlines are extended as follows: FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 2/16/2023, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 3/2/2023, Joint Status Report due by 3/9/2023. (AD) |
| Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on Richard Hunt on 1/3/2023, filed by Plaintiff Mychel Anderson. (Alexander, William) |
| Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on Adcom Group Inc on 1/3/2023, filed by Plaintiff Mychel Anderson. (Alexander, William) |
Filing 9
ORDER re #4 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney William Clifton Alexander for Plaintiff Mychel Anderson, by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(CDA)
|
| Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Adcom Group Inc, Richard Hunt (Rocke, Aaron) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT by Judge John H. Chun. Joint Status Report due by 2/23/2023, FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 2/2/2023, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 2/16/2023. (AD)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER re #5 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Austin Anderson for Plaintiff Mychel Anderson, by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(CDA)
|
| Filing 5 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Austin Anderson FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Mychel Anderson (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7847438 (Subit, Michael) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Clif Alexander FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Mychel Anderson (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-7847190 (Subit, Michael) |
| Attorney Jeremy Scott Bartels added for Adcom Group Inc per Defendants' #3 Notice of Appearance. (SB) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Aaron Vincent Rocke on behalf of Defendants Adcom Group Inc, Richard Hunt. (Rocke, Aaron) |
| Filing 2 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Adcom Group Inc, Richard Hunt. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (RE) |
| Judge John H. Chun added. (RE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # AWAWDC-7811613), filed by Mychel Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons of Adcom, #3 Summons of Richard Hunt)(Subit, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
