In re: Amanda Rae Lilly
| Amanda Rae Lilly |
| 2:2022rd00003 |
| January 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Suspension from the Washington State Bar Association, Proceeding No. 21#00044, with Supreme Court of Washington Order No. 202,043-7 suspending Amanda Rae Lilly for a period of two years. (JWC) |
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (JWC) |
| Prior reciprocal discipline case logged in ECF (see 2:21-rd-00058). Amanda Rae Lilly was suspended on 6/28/2021 by the Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez and was never reinstated. Amanda Rae Lilly remains on suspended status with our Court. (JWC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: In re: Amanda Rae Lilly | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| In re: Amanda Rae Lilly | |
| Represented By: | Amanda Rae Lilly |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
