Smith v. Auburn Police Department Officers et al
Plaintiff: Ronald A Smith
Defendant: Auburn Police Department Officers, Child Protective Services and King County Courts RJC
Consolidated Defendant: Auburn Police Department and King County Superior Courts
Case Number: 2:2023cv00079
Filed: January 17, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Seattle Office
Presiding Judge: Tana Lin
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting Plaintiff's #10 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff's deadline to file a consolidated amended complaint is EXTENDED to 3/27/2023. Signed by Judge Tana Lin. (LH) (cc: Plaintiff via US mail)
February 24, 2023 Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Consolidated Amended Complaint, filed by Plaintiff Ronald A Smith. Noted by Clerk for 3/10/2023. (LH)
January 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER of Consolidation and Dismissal with Leave to Amend. The Court DECLINES to serve summons in this action. Smith I and Smith II are CONSOLIDATED into the case number 2:23-cv-00079-TL. All future pleadings in the consolidated action shall bear the case number 2:23-cv-00079-TL. If Plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint by February 25, 2023, as previously ordered in Smith I, he must include all relevant allegations and claims for the consolidated action in the complaint. Signed by Judge Tana Lin. (LH) (cc: Plaintiff via US mail)
January 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: The Court DECLINES to issue summons and DISMISSES the Complaint without prejudice. Mr. Smith is GRANTED LEAVE to file an amended complaint curing the deficiencies of his claim by 2/25/2023. Failure to file a timely amended complaint will result in the dismissal of this case. Signed by Judge Tana Lin. (SS) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
January 19, 2023 Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER (text only) made at the direction of Judge Tana Lin: The Court has posted Chambers Procedures at http://www.wawd.uscourts.gov/judges/lin-procedures. All counsel and unrepresented ("pro se") parties are DIRECTED to review them, if they have not already done so. Failure to follow the requirements set forth in the Chambers Procedures may result in the imposition of sanctions. (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) (KMP)
January 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STANDING ORDER REGARDING 28 U.S.C. 455 AND CANON 3 OF THE CODE OF CONDUCT FOR UNITED STATES JUDGES by Judge Tana Lin. (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) (KMP)
January 18, 2023 Filing 5 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Auburn Police Department Officers, Child Protective Services, King County Courts RJC with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # IFP granted), filed by Ronald A Smith. (LH) (Main Document 5 replaced on 1/18/2023) (LH).
January 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting Plaintiff's #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. (LH) (cc: Plaintiff via US mail)
January 18, 2023 Filing 3 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment. filed by Ronald A Smith. cc: sent to filer via USPS. (CR)
January 18, 2023 REFERRING #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis to: Judge Brian A Tsuchida (CR)
January 17, 2023 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Ronald A Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 PROPOSED Complaint)(CR) Modified on 1/18/2023 corrected file date. (CR).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Auburn Police Department Officers et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald A Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Auburn Police Department Officers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Child Protective Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: King County Courts RJC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Consolidated defendant: Auburn Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Consolidated defendant: King County Superior Courts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?