NAC Group Inc v. F5 Inc
NAC Group Inc. and NAC Group Inc |
F5, Inc. and F5 Inc |
2:2023cv00110 |
January 25, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
John C Coughenour |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE of Summons upon defendant F5 Inc mailed on 1/31/2023 (Ahn, Jihee) |
Filing 6 ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY AND DEPOSITIONS by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (KMP) |
Filing 5 DEMAND for JURY TRIAL by Plaintiff NAC Group Inc (Ahn, Jihee) |
Filing 4 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant F5 Inc (CR) |
Filing 3 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Complaint,. ***Action Required*** Jury Demand Improperly Indicated.See attached letter for more information and instructions. (CR) |
U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour added. (CR) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by NAC Group Inc. (Ahn, Jihee) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) F5, Inc. with JURY DEMAND, filed by NAC Group Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Ahn, Jihee) (Receipt # AWAWDC-7862704) Modified on 1/25/2023 to add receipt number (JF). Modified on 1/26/2023, jury demand not in compliance with LCR38(b) (CR). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.