Progressive Direct Insurance Company v. Curry et al
| Progressive Direct Insurance Company |
| Fred Curry, Robin Baker and Hollie Denini |
| 2:2023cv00121 |
| January 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| S Kate Vaughan |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Robin Baker, Fred Curry, Hollie Denini (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons) (CR) |
| Filing 3 STATEMENT regarding Rule 7.1 by Plaintiff Progressive Direct Insurance Company (Neal, Eric) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent The Progressive Corporation, Corporate Parent Progressive Direct Holdings, Inc. for Progressive Direct Insurance Company. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Progressive Direct Insurance Company (Neal, Eric) |
| Hon. S. Kate Vaughan added. (CR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Relief against defendant(s) Robin Baker, Fred Curry, Hollie Denini (Receipt # AWAWDC-7864441) Attorney Eric J Neal added to party Progressive Direct Insurance Company(pty:pla), filed by Progressive Direct Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Neal, Eric) (Attachment 1 replaced on 1/27/2023 due to malformed PDF) (CDA). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
