Vasilash et al v. Garland et al
| Peter Vasilash |
| Merrick B Garland, Nathalie Asher and Bruce Scott |
| 2:2023cv00502 |
| March 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Theresa L Fricke |
| Richard A Jones |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER Granting Respondent's #4 Motion to Dismiss for Mootness. Signed by Judge Richard A. Jones. (MW)
|
| Filing 5 Mail addressed to Peter Vasilash returned as Undeliverable re #2 Letter (MW) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Mootness, filed by Respondents Nathalie Asher, Merrick B Garland. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Dismiss for Mootness) Noting Date 5/5/2023, (Lambert, Michelle) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Michelle R. Lambert on behalf of Respondents Nathalie Asher, Merrick B Garland. (Lambert, Michelle) |
| Filing 2 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment. (MW) (cc: Petitioner via USPS) Modified on 4/3/2023 re-generated entry for US Attorney Habeas (CDA). |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Receipt # SEA 2-1704) filed by Peter Vasilash.(MW) Modified on 4/3/2023 re-generated entry for US Attorney Habeas (CDA). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
