Hagos v. Smith et al
Plaintiff: Daniel Teklemariam Hagos
Defendant: Cheyenne Smith and City of Seattle
Case Number: 2:2023cv00528
Filed: April 5, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: Robert J Bryan
Referring Judge: David W Christel
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 31, 2023 Filing 10 JUDGMENT BY COURT in favor of City of Seattle, Cheyenne Smith against Daniel Teklemariam Hagos. Paper copy sent to Plaintiff at Seattle address. (TC)
May 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #7 Objections to Report and Recommendation filed by Daniel Teklemariam Hagos. Signed by Judge Robert J. Bryan. Paper copy sent to plaintiff at Seattle address. (JL)
May 24, 2023 Filing 8 SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTIONS #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Plaintiff Daniel Teklemariam Hagos (CR)
May 11, 2023 Filing 7 OBJECTIONS to #5 Report and Recommendations by Plaintiff Daniel Teklemariam Hagos Noting Date 5/26/2023, (CR)
May 11, 2023 Filing 6 DISREGARD, DOCKETED IN ERROR MISCELLANEOUS DOCUMENT (Objection Order and Findings and Recommendations) ; filed by Plaintiff Daniel Teklemariam Hagos. (CR) Modified on 5/25/2023 strike entry, wrong event used (CR).
May 5, 2023 Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Daniel Teklemariam Hagos. The parties shall have fourteen (14) days from service of this report to file written objections. This matter is set for consideration on 5/26/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge David W. Christel. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proposed Judgment)(AMD - cc: Pltf via USPS)
April 19, 2023 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis before Judge David W. Christel filed by Daniel Teklemariam Hagos. (Attachments: #1 PROPOSED 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, #2 Exhibit, #3 Prison Trust Account Statement) (CR)
April 19, 2023 Deficiency corrected. (CR)
April 7, 2023 Filing 2 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Proposed Document(s). ***Action Required*** 1983 Filing Fee Not Paid.See attached letter for more information and instructions. Filer has until 5/8/2023 to correct IFP application (Attachments: #1 IFP Application Form) (TE)
April 6, 2023 Filing 1 PROPOSED 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint filed by Plaintiff Daniel Teklemariam Hagos. (NO FILING FEE/NO IFP APPLICATION RECEIVED) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(TE)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hagos v. Smith et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Teklemariam Hagos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cheyenne Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Seattle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?