Lumpkin v. Toxic Water Settlement et al
| Robert Joseph Lumpkin |
| Toxic Water Settlement, United States Department of Justice, Union Pacific, Metro King County and United States Navy |
| 2:2023cv00583 |
| April 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| John C Coughenour |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 JUDGMENT BY COURT: Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. (SS) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) |
Filing 6
ORDER: Plaintiff's #5 Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. The deficiencies identified and noted previously cannot be cured by further amendment. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (SS) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
|
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Receipt # IFP Granted), filed by Robert Joseph Lumpkin. (SS) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting Plaintiff's #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson. (SS) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
|
| Filing 3 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment. cc: Letter sent to plaintiff via USPS. (CR) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis before Judge Michelle L. Peterson filed by Robert Joseph Lumpkin. (Attachments: #1 PROPOSED Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (CR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
