Hagos v. Washington State Department of Social Services et al
| Daniel Teklemariam Hagos |
| Washington State Department of Social Services, Department of Public Defense, King County Prosecutor's Office, Melissa Dannelet, Tatiana Damnjanovic, Liza Parisky and Edmond Owen Lesesne |
| 2:2023cv00617 |
| April 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Lauren King |
| Grady J Leupold |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 OBJECTIONS by Plaintiff Daniel Teklemariam Hagos to #4 Report and Recommendations. Noted for 7/7/2023. (SS) |
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Daniel Teklemariam Hagos. The parties shall have fourteen (14) days from service of this report to file written objections. This matter is set for consideration on 6/23/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Grady J Leupold. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proposed Judgment)(AMD - cc: Pltf via USPS) |
| Filing 3 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment. cc: pltf via USPS. (TE) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis before Judge Grady J. Leupold filed by Daniel Teklemariam Hagos. (Attachments: #1 Proposed 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope)(TE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
