Lumpkin v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Robert Joseph Lumpkin, Jr |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 2:2023cv00622 |
| April 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| S Kate Vaughan |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER Dismissing Case Without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (LH) (cc: Plaintiff via US mail)
|
|
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER REASSIGNING CASE by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. Case reassigned to Judge Ricardo S. Martinez for all further proceedings. Case no longer assigned to the Hon. S. Kate Vaughan. (cc: plaintiff via USPS) (SNP)
|
| Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER by Hon. S. Kate Vaughan, United States Magistrate Judge; Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), Dkt. #1 , is deficient. Plaintiff must submit a revised, signed IFP application within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order. (TF)(cc: Pro Se Pltf via USPS) |
| Filing 3 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment. (cc plaintiff via USPS) (RE) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis before Judge S. Kate Vaughan filed by Robert Joseph Lumpkin, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (RE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
