Silva v Rosario Signal LLC
| Angelica Silva |
| Rosario Signal, LLC and Rosario Signal LLC |
| 2:2023cv00640 |
| May 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| John C Coughenour |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 JOINT STATUS REPORT signed by all parties. Estimated Trial Days: 8. (Maloney, Amy) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Rosario Signal LLC.(Morisset, Catharine) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT DATES All counsel and any pro se parties are directed to meet and confer and to provide the Court with a combined Joint Status Report (the Report) by the deadline set below. This meet-and-confer must be a face-to-face meeting or a telephonic conference. If the parties are unable to agree on any part of the Report, they may answer in separate paragraphs; no separate reports are to be filed. In addition to the requirements articulated in FRCP 26(f)(3), the Report must contain the following information: 1. An estimate of the number of days needed for trial; 2. The date by which the case will be ready for trial; and 3. Whether the parties intend to mediate per LCR 39.1 and, if so, when the parties expect to complete mediation.The deadlines below may be extended only by court order. Any request for extension of these deadlines should be made by email to Courtroom Deputy Clerk Kadya Peter at kadya_peter@wawd.uscourts.gov. The parties who have appeared in this matter must meet and confer before contacting the Court to request an extension. If this case involves claims that are exempt from the requirements of FRCP 26(a) and 26(f), please notify the Courtroom Deputy Clerk. Please note: Initial Disclosures are not to be filed. FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 6/29/2023, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 7/6/2023, Joint Status Report due by 7/13/2023. (KMP) |
| Attorney Dean L Petitta added for Defendant Rosario Signal LLC per #6 Notice of Appearance. (SS) |
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1). Filed by Rosario Signal LLC. (Morisset, Catharine) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Catharine M Morisset on behalf of Defendant Rosario Signal LLC. (Morisset, Catharine) |
Filing 5
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY AND DEPOSITIONS by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (KMP)
|
| Filing 4 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Complaint,. ***Action Required*** Improper Signature - Secondary Attorney(s).See attached letter for more information and instructions. (MG) Modified on 5/3/2023 to edit Notice. (RE) |
| Filing 3 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Rosario Signal LLC (MG) |
| U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour added. (MG) |
| NOTICE of Docket Text Modification re #4 Case/IFP Deficiency Letter: Notice of Deficiency filed in error, secondary attorney filed a Notice of Appearance. (RE) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Matthew James O'Laughlin on behalf of Plaintiff Angelica Silva. (O'Laughlin, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Angelica Silva with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # AWAWDC-7992249) Attorney Amy K Maloney added to party Angelica Silva(pty:pla) filed by Angelica Silva. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Charge of Discrimination, #2 Exhibit Notice of Right to Sue, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons)(Maloney, Amy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
