Quinn v. Austin
Plaintiff: Dion Quinn
Defendant: Lloyd J Austin, III
Case Number: 2:2023cv00665
Filed: May 6, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: James L Robart
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REFERRING TO PRO BONO PANEL. The court DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to forward Mr. Quinn's complaint (Dkt. #4 ), the motion to appoint counsel (Dkt. #7 ), his financial affidavit (Dkt. #6 ), and any other pleadings and documents filed to date to the Screening Committee. The court ORDERS the Screening Committee to review the case and make a recommendation to the court in accordance with the pro bono plan and the rules for the pro bono panel on or before July 26, 2023. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (LH) (cc: Pro Bono Coordinator) Modified on 6/27/2023 - cc: Plaintiff via US mail (LH)
June 27, 2023 Filing 7 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, filed by Plaintiff Dion Quinn. Noting Date 7/26/2023. (LH)
June 26, 2023 Filing 6 DECLARATION of Finances re #5 Order APPLICATION To Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Plaintiff Dion Quinn. (Attachments: #1 Email Transmission of IFP Form) (CR) Modified documemt title and added linkage on 6/27/2023 (LH)
June 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER. The court DEFERS ruling on Mr. Quinn's motion for appointment of counsel and ORDERS Mr. Quinn to file a financial affidavit/declaration describing his financial resources by no later than 6/26/2023. If Mr. Quinn fails to file a financial affidavit/declaration by that date, the court will deny his motion for appointment of counsel. The court DIRECTS the Clerk to note Mr. Quinn's motion for appointment of counsel (Dkt. #4 -1) for 6/26/2023. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (SB) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
June 5, 2023 Filing 4 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Lloyd J Austin, III with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # 200002179) filed by Dion Quinn. (Attachments: #1 Application for Court-Appointed Counsel, #2 Email Transmission of Amended Petition) (CR)
June 5, 2023 FILING FEE RECEIVED: $ 402.00, receipt number 200002179 (CR)
May 30, 2023 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET; filed by Plaintiff Dion Quinn. (CR)
May 8, 2023 Filing 2 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 PROPOSED Complaint for Employment Discrimination. ***Action Required*** Filing Fee Not Paid, Civil Cover Sheet Omitted.See attached letter for more information and instructions. Filer has until 6/7/2023 to correct IFP application (cc: Plaintiff via USPS w/ IFP and CCS forms) (JWC)
May 6, 2023 Filing 1 PROPOSED Complaint for Employment Discrimination filed by Plaintiff Dion Quinn (Attachments: #1 PROPOSED Motion for Appointment of Counsel, #2 E-mail from Filer) (JWC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Quinn v. Austin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dion Quinn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lloyd J Austin, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?