Centro Veterinario y Agricola Limitada v. Aquatic Life Sciences Inc
| Centro Veterinario y Agricola Limitada doing business as Centrovet Laboratories Inc. and Centro Veterinario y Agricola Limitada doing business as Centrovet Laboratories Inc |
| Aquatic Life Sciences Inc. doing business as Syndel and Aquatic Life Sciences Inc doing business as Syndel |
| 2:2023cv00693 |
| May 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Lauren King |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 33
DECLARATION of Tyler J. Hermsen filed by Defendant Aquatic Life Sciences Inc re #32 MOTION for Order Authorizing Entitlement of Atty Fees & Costs Re FRCP 54(d) Based on Contract (Brown, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 32
MOTION for Order Authorizing Entitlement of Atty Fees & Costs Re FRCP 54(d) Based on Contract, filed by Defendant Aquatic Life Sciences Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 7/21/2023, (Brown, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 31
JUDGMENT BY COURT: For the reasons set forth in the Court's 6/16/2023 Order, Dkt. No. #30 , judgment is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff. (SS)
|
|
Filing 30
ORDER granting Defendant's #17 Motion to Dismiss. Centrovet's motion for a TRO is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Lauren King. (SS)
|
|
Filing 29
SURREPLY filed by Plaintiff Centro Veterinario y Agricola Limitada re #12 MOTION to Dismiss (Vitruk, Alexander)
|
|
Filing 28
NOTICE of Intent to File Sur-Reply ; filed by Plaintiff Centro Veterinario y Agricola Limitada. (Vitruk, Alexander)
|
|
Attorneys Sumeer Singla and Tyler J Hermsen added for Defendant Aquatic Life Sciences Inc per #25 Notice of Attorney Association. (SS)
|
|
Filing 27
REPLY, filed by Defendant Aquatic Life Sciences Inc, TO RESPONSE to #17 MOTION to Dismiss re Forum Selection Clause (Brown, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 26
DECLARATION of Alexander Vitruk iso Plaintiff Centrovet's Reply re #24 Reply to Response to Motion by Plaintiff Centro Veterinario y Agricola Limitada (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Vitruk, Alexander)
|
|
Filing 25
NOTICE of Association of Attorney by Daniel Andrew Brown on behalf of Defendant Aquatic Life Sciences Inc. (Brown, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 24
REPLY, filed by Plaintiff Centro Veterinario y Agricola Limitada, TO RESPONSE to #11 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order (Hineline, Curt)
|
|
Filing 23
RESPONSE, by Plaintiff Centro Veterinario y Agricola Limitada, to #17 MOTION to Dismiss re Forum Selection Clause. (Hineline, Curt)
|
|
Filing 22
PLEASE DISREGARD RESPONSE, by Plaintiff Centro Veterinario y Agricola Limitada, to #17 MOTION to Dismiss re Forum Selection Clause. (Hineline, Curt Modified on 6/12/2023 to strike docket entry at request of filer (KB).
|
|
NOTICE of Docket Text Modification re #22 Response to Motion: Modified on 6/12/2023 to strike docket entry at request of filer. (KB)
|
|
Filing 21
DECLARATION of Chris McReynolds filed by Defendant Aquatic Life Sciences Inc re #11 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order (Brown, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 20
RESPONSE, by Defendant Aquatic Life Sciences Inc, to #11 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order . (Brown, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 19
RESPONSE, by Plaintiff Centro Veterinario y Agricola Limitada, to #17 MOTION to Dismiss re Forum Selection Clause. (Hineline, Curt)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER (text only) authorized by Judge Lauren King. In light of Centrovet's request for additional time to respond to #17 Syndel's motion to dismiss, the Court will allow Centrovet to file a supplemental brief of no more than 1400 words regarding the motion to dismiss by Monday, June 12, 2023 at 12:00 p.m. The deadline for Syndel's reply brief on its motion to dismiss is accordingly extended to Tuesday, June 13, 2023 at 12:00 p.m. The Court STRIKES the hearing set for June 14, 2023. (NAW)
|
|
Filing 18
RESPONSE by Defendant Aquatic Life Sciences Inc re 13 Minute Order,, (Brown, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 17
MOTION to Dismiss re Forum Selection Clause, filed by Defendant Aquatic Life Sciences Inc. Oral Argument Requested. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 6/14/2023, (Brown, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 16
NOTICE OF HEARING on #11 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and if refiled, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss: Motion Hearing set for 6/14/2023 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 15106 before Judge Lauren King. (NAW)
|
|
Filing 15
NOTICE to Withdraw Pending Motion re #12 MOTION to Dismiss ; by Defendant Aquatic Life Sciences Inc. (Brown, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 14
MINUTE ORDER (text only) authorized by Judge Lauren King. Defendant is ordered to respond to Plaintiff's #11 Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order by Friday, June 9, 2023 at 2:30 p.m. and shall include in its response its position as to (1) whether the temporary restraining order can be resolved without Court intervention, and (2) whether the motion should be heard at a later time after a full briefing schedule. Plaintiff's reply brief is due Monday, June 12, 2023 by 2:30 p.m. Plaintiff should provide its position on the two issues listed above in its reply brief. If the Court does not strike Defendant's #12 Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiff is ordered to respond to that motion by Friday, June 9, 2023 at 2:30 p.m., and Defendant may file an optional reply brief by Monday, June 12, 2023 by 2:30 p.m. (NAW)
|
|
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER (text only) authorized by Judge Lauren King. Defendant's #12 Motion to Dismiss does not comply with the Court's Standing Order for All Civil Cases because it does not contain the required certification that Defendant made a meaningful effort to confer with Plaintiff before filing its dispositive motion, Dkt. No. #6 at 6 ("Parties must make a meaningful effort to confer prior to filing a dispositive motion. Such motions must contain a certification of conferral."). Given the pending motion for a TRO, Dkt. No. #11 , Defendant must show cause why its Motion to Dismiss should not be stricken in its entirety for failure to comply with the Court's prior order no later than June 8, 2023. (NAW)
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Defendant Aquatic Life Sciences Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 6/30/2023, (Brown, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order , filed by Plaintiff Centro Veterinario y Agricola Limitada. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Alexander Vitruk iso Motion for TRO and PI, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Declaration of Bernd Wrege iso Motion for TRO and PI, #12 Exhibit A, #13 Exhibit B, #14 Exhibit C, #15 Exhibit D, #16 Exhibit E, #17 Exhibit F, #18 Exhibit G, #19 Exhibit H, #20 Exhibit i, #21 Exhibit J, #22 Exhibit K, #23 Exhibit L, #24 Exhibit M, #25 Exhibit N, #26 Exhibit O, #27 Exhibit P, #28 Exhibit Q, #29 Exhibit R, #30 Exhibit S, #31 Exhibit T, #32 Exhibit U, #33 Exhibit V, #34 Exhibit W, #35 Exhibit X, #36 Exhibit Y, #37 Exhibit Z, #38 Exhibit AA) Noting Date 6/7/2023, (Hineline, Curt)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT. FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 7/5/2023, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 7/18/2023, Joint Status Report due by 8/1/2023. Signed by Judge Lauren King. (NAW)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Daniel Andrew Brown on behalf of Defendant Aquatic Life Sciences Inc. (Brown, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 8
SERVICE OF SUMMONS and Complaint returned executed upon defendant Aquatic Life Sciences Inc on 5/15/2023 (Hineline, Curt)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Alexander Vitruk on behalf of Plaintiff Centro Veterinario y Agricola Limitada. (Vitruk, Alexander)
|
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER FOR ALL CIVIL CASES. The procedures in this Order supplement, and in some cases, supersede the local rules. The parties are responsible for being familiar with the procedures in this Order. Failure to comply with the procedures may result in sanctions. Signed by Judge Lauren King. (NAW)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER REGARDING 28 U.S.C. 455(b)(2) AND CANON 3(C)(1)(B) OF THE CODE OF CONDUCT FOR UNITED STATES JUDGES by Judge Lauren King. (NAW)
|
|
Filing 4
Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Complaint,,. ***Action Required*** Improper Signature - Secondary Attorney(s).See attached letter for more information and instructions. (MG)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Aquatic Life Sciences Inc (Attachments: #1 Summons) (MG)
|
|
Judge Lauren King added. (MG)
|
|
Filing 2
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Virbac S.A., Other Affiliate Holding Salud Animal S.A, Other Affiliate Farquimica SpA, Other Affiliate Virbac Patagonia Ltda, Other Affiliate Virbac LatAm SpA, Other Affiliate Virbac Chile SpA for Centro Veterinario y Agricola Limitada. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1). Filed by Centro Veterinario y Agricola Limitada. (Hineline, Curt)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT OF IMPLIED DUTY OF GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING, UNJUST ENRICHMENT, AND DECLARATORY RELIEF against defendant(s) Aquatic Life Sciences Inc. with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # AWAWDC-8005612) filed by Centro Veterinario y Agricola Limitada. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - November 2013 Supply Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - February 2020 Amendment to Supply Agreement, #3 Exhibit C - September 2021 Amendment to Supply Agreement, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons for Syndel, #6 Summons for Registered Agent)(Hineline, Curt)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Centro Veterinario y Agricola Limitada v. Aquatic Life Sciences Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Centro Veterinario y Agricola Limitada doing business as Centrovet Laboratories Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Curt Roy Hineline |
| Represented By: | Alexander Vitruk |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Centro Veterinario y Agricola Limitada doing business as Centrovet Laboratories Inc | |
| Represented By: | Curt Roy Hineline |
| Represented By: | Alexander Vitruk |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Aquatic Life Sciences Inc. doing business as Syndel | |
| Represented By: | Susan E Lehr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Aquatic Life Sciences Inc doing business as Syndel | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Andrew Brown |
| Represented By: | Sumeer Singla |
| Represented By: | Tyler J Hermsen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
