Immersion Corporation v. Valve Corporation
| Immersion Corporation |
| Valve Corporation |
| 2:2023cv00712 |
| May 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tana Lin |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 29 REPLY, filed by Defendant Valve Corporation, TO RESPONSE to #25 MOTION to Vacate FRCP 26(F) Conference, FRCP 26(A) Disclosures, and Joint Status Report Deadlines (Skok, Gavin) |
| Filing 28 AFFIDAVIT of Stefan Szpajda filed by Plaintiff Immersion Corporation re #27 Response to Motion (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Szpajda, Stefan) |
| Filing 27 RESPONSE, by Plaintiff Immersion Corporation, to #25 MOTION to Vacate FRCP 26(F) Conference, FRCP 26(A) Disclosures, and Joint Status Report Deadlines. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Szpajda, Stefan) |
| Filing 26 DECLARATION of Gavin Skok filed by Defendant Valve Corporation re #25 MOTION to Vacate FRCP 26(F) Conference, FRCP 26(A) Disclosures, and Joint Status Report Deadlines (Skok, Gavin) |
| Filing 25 MOTION to Vacate FRCP 26(F) Conference, FRCP 26(A) Disclosures, and Joint Status Report Deadlines, filed by Defendant Valve Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 7/14/2023, (Skok, Gavin) |
Filing 24
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT FOR PATENT CASES by Judge Tana Lin. FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 7/7/2023, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 7/21/2023, Joint Status Report due by 8/4/2023. (KMP)
|
|
Filing 23
ORDER granting Parties' #20 Motion for Extension of Time. The time for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. #1 ) is extended to July 24, 2023. Signed by Judge Tana Lin. (LH)
|
| Filing 22 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Gavin William Skok on behalf of Defendant Valve Corporation. (Skok, Gavin) |
| Filing 21 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1). Filed by Valve Corporation. (Skok, Gavin) |
| Filing 20 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, filed by Defendant Valve Corporation. Noting Date 6/5/2023, (Skok, Gavin) |
| Filing 19 MINUTE ORDER (text only) made at the direction of Judge Tana Lin: The Court has posted Chambers Procedures at http://www.wawd.uscourts.gov/judges/lin-procedures. All counsel and unrepresented ("pro se") parties are DIRECTED to review them, if they have not already done so. Failure to follow the requirements set forth in the Chambers Procedures may result in the imposition of sanctions. (KMP) |
|
Filing 18
STANDING ORDER REGARDING 28 U.S.C. 455 AND CANON 3 OF THE CODE OF CONDUCT FOR UNITED STATES JUDGES by Judge Tana Lin. (KMP)
|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Cristofer Ivan Leffler on behalf of Plaintiff Immersion Corporation. (Leffler, Cristofer) |
| Filing 16 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Complaint,,. ***Action Required*** Improper Signature - Secondary Attorney(s).See attached letter for more information and instructions. (CDA) |
| Filing 15 SERVICE OF SUMMONS and Complaint returned executed upon defendant Valve Corporation on 5/18/2023 (Szpajda, Stefan) |
| Filing 14 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant Valve Corporation (CR) |
| Filing 13 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action. Emailed to the US Patent Office (Attachments: #1 Report on Patents and Trademarks (AO Form 120)) (CR) |
| Judge Tana Lin added. (CR) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER re #7 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Sam Kim for Plaintiff Immersion Corporation by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d). (JWC)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER re #6 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Palani P Rathinasamy for Plaintiff Immersion Corporation by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d). (JWC)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER re #5 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney C Maclain Wells for Plaintiff Immersion Corporation by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d). (JWC)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER re #4 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney David Schumann for Plaintiff Immersion Corporation by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d). (JWC)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER re #3 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Alexandra Olwen Fellowes for Plaintiff Immersion Corporation by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d). (JWC)
|
| Filing 7 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Sam Kim FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Immersion Corporation (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-8009036 (Szpajda, Stefan) |
| Filing 6 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Palani P. Rathinasamy FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Immersion Corporation (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-8009013 (Szpajda, Stefan) |
| Filing 5 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY C. Maclain Wells FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Immersion Corporation (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-8009003 (Szpajda, Stefan) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY David Schumann FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Immersion Corporation (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-8008987 (Szpajda, Stefan) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Alexandra Olwen Fellowes FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Immersion Corporation (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-8008979 (Szpajda, Stefan) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1). Filed by Immersion Corporation. (Szpajda, Stefan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Valve Corporation with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # AWAWDC-8008864) Attorney Stefan J. Szpajda added to party Immersion Corporation(pty:pla) filed by Immersion Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Summons, #10 Report on Patents and Trademarks (AO Form 120) Pt 1, #11 Report on Patents and Trademarks (AO Form 120) Pt 2)(Szpajda, Stefan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
