Watters v. Parviz
| Andrew G Watters |
| Mahsa Parviz |
| 2:2023cv00755 |
| May 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Robert S Lasnik |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
AMENDED SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Defendant's #8 motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) is GRANTED in part. Plaintiffs Computer Fraud and Abuse Act claim has not been adequately alleged. In the absence of a federal claim, the balance of the relevant factors points toward declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims. Plaintiff is again ordered to show cause why the above-captioned matter should not be dismissed. Plaintiffs response shall be filed on or before July 28, 2023. Defendant's motion for sanctions is DENIED on the current record without prejudice to its being renewed in the future. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (cc: Defendant via USPS)(MJV)
|
| #16 Order to Show Cause NOTED on motion calendar for 7/28/2023. (LH) |
| Filing 15 STATUS REPORT AND DISCOVERY PLAN by Defendant Mahsa Parviz (Attachments: #1 Letter to Clerk, #2 Letter to Thomas Bundy, #3 Declaration of Mahsa Parviz, #4 Envelope Transmittal)(MJV) |
| Filing 14 STATUS REPORT by Plaintiff Andrew G Watters (Watters, Andrew) |
|
Filing 13
SECOND ORDER to Show Cause. Defendant's #8 motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) is GRANTED in part. Plaintiff's Computer Fraud and Abuse Act claim has not been adequately alleged. In the absence of a federal claim, the balance of the relevant factors points toward declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims. Plaintiff is again ordered to show cause why this matter should not be dismissed. Defendant's motion for sanctions is DENIED on the current record without prejudice to its being renewed in the future. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SB) (cc: Defendant via USPS)
|
| Filing 12 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on Mahsa Parviz on 6/7/2023, filed by Plaintiff Andrew G Watters. (Watters, Andrew) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT AND EARLY SETTLEMENT signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. Joint Status Report due by 7/10/2023. (cc: Defendant via US Mail) (VE)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER VACATING #5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (LH)
|
| Filing 9 SEALED DOCUMENT Exhibits by Defendant Mahsa Parviz re #8 Rule 12 MOTION, Answer, and Motion for Protective Order. (LH) |
| Filing 8 Rule 12 MOTION, Answer, and Motion for Protective Order, filed by Defendant Mahsa Parviz. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noted by Clerk for 6/23/2023 (LH) (Updated Defendant address on docket) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE, by Plaintiff Andrew G Watters, to re #5 Order to Show Cause, NOTED on motion calendar;. (Watters, Andrew) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Mahsa Parviz filed by Andrew G Watters.(Watters, Andrew) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this matter should not be dismissed for having failed to provide evidence establishing that it is more likely than not that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. Show Cause Response due by 6/7/2023. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (MJV)
|
| #5 Order to Show Cause NOTED on motion calendar for 6/9/2023. (MJV) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE: Plaintiff Andrew G Watters has registered to electronically file and receive electronic service in this case. (CDA) |
| Filing 3 Summons(es) Issued in Paper Form as to defendant(s) Mahsa Parviz (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) (JWC) |
| Filing 2 DISREGARD Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Complaint. ***Action Required*** Improper Signature.See attached letter for more information and instructions. Corrected signature page must be filed by 6/6/2023. (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) (JWC) Modified on 5/23/2023 as signatures on Complaint are OK as submitted (JWC). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Mahsa Parviz (Receipt # S2-2076) filed by Andrew G Watters. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 E-mail from Filer) (JWC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Watters v. Parviz | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Andrew G Watters | |
| Represented By: | Andrew G Watters |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mahsa Parviz | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
