Tinoco Cruz v. Nolan et al
Mario Tinoco Cruz |
Connie Nolan, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and United States Department of Homeland Security |
2:2023cv00776 |
May 24, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Richard A Jones |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) All Defendants. (SS) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Richard A. Jones. (VE) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Receipt # IFP Granted), filed by Mario Tinoco Cruz. (SS) |
Filing 2 ORDER granting Plaintiff's #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson. (SS) |
Judge Richard A. Jones added. (JWC) |
REFERRING #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis For Complaint For Writ of Mandamus to: Judge Michelle L. Peterson (JWC) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis For Complaint For Writ of Mandamus filed by Mario Tinoco Cruz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Summons Ur Jaddou, #4 Summons United States Citizenship and Immigration, #5 Summons United States Department of Homeland Security, #6 Summons Connie Nolan, #7 Summons Alejandro Mayorkas)(Rich, Katherine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.