Marcos-Chavela v. OL Reign Groupe et al
| Susan Marcos-Chavela |
| OL Reign Groupe, Jeffrey Bezos, Lumen Field, Jody Allen, Seattle Seahawks and City of Seattle |
| 2:2023cv00897 |
| June 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tana Lin |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER of Dismissal. The Court DECLINES to issue summons and DISMISSES this action without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff is GRANTED LEAVE to file an amended complaint within fourteen (14) days of this Order. Signed by Judge Tana Lin. (LH) (cc: Plaintiff via US mail)
|
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Jody Allen, Jeffrey Bezos, City of Seattle, Lumen Field, OL Reign Groupe, Seattle Seahawks with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # IFP granted) filed by Susan Marcos-Chavela. (LH) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting Plaintiff's #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Hon. S. Kate Vaughan. (LH) (cc: Plaintiff via US mail)
|
| Filing 3 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment. (cc plaintiff via USPS) (RE) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis before Judge S. Kate Vaughan filed by Susan Marcos-Chavela. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (RE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
