Wamae v. Blinken et al
Nyagah Wamae and Jane Mwara |
Antony J Blinken, Marc D Dillard and Caterhine McGeary |
2:2023cv00986 |
July 1, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Lauren King |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER FOR ALL CIVIL CASES. The procedures in this Order supplement, and in some cases, supersede the local rules. The parties are responsible for being familiar with the procedures in this Order. Failure to comply with the procedures may result in sanctions. Signed by Judge Lauren King. (NAW) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER REGARDING 28 U.S.C. 455(b)(2) AND CANON 3(C)(1)(B) OF THE CODE OF CONDUCT FOR UNITED STATES JUDGES by Judge Lauren King. (NAW) |
Filing 2 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Antony J Blinken, Marc D Dillard, Caterhine McGeary (CR) |
Judge Lauren King added. (CR) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Review Under the Administrative Procedure Act & For Writ of Mandamus against All Defendants (Receipt # AWAWDC-8072329) Attorney Bart Klein added to party Jane Mwara(pty:pla), Attorney Bart Klein added to party Nyagah Wamae(pty:pla) filed by Nyagah Wamae, Jane Mwara. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Klein, Bart) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.