Hayat v. Lehman et al
| Fakhar Hayat |
| Danielle Lehman, Loren Miller, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Alejandro Mayorkas |
| 2:2023cv01040 |
| July 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| John H Chun |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT by Judge John H. Chun. Joint Status Report due by 10/5/2023, FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 9/14/2023, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 9/28/2023. (AD)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Malcolm McDermond on behalf of Defendants Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Danielle Lehman, Alejandro Mayorkas, Loren Miller. (McDermond, Malcolm) |
| Filing 2 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Danielle Lehman, Alejandro Mayorkas, Loren Miller (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons) (CR) |
| Judge John H. Chun added. (CR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Receipt # AWAWDC-8084734) Attorney Devin T Theriot-Orr added to party Fakhar Hayat(pty:pla) filed by Fakhar Hayat. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons)(Theriot-Orr, Devin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
