Kamat v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Plaintiff: Yash Kamat
Defendant: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Case Number: 2:2023cv01133
Filed: July 31, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: John H Chun
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT by Judge John H. Chun. Joint Status Report due by 10/17/2023, FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 9/26/2023, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 10/10/2023. (AD)
September 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Michelle R. Lambert on behalf of Defendant United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (Lambert, Michelle)
September 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SERVICE OF SUMMONS and Complaint returned executed upon defendant All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Proof of Service)(Banias, Brad)
August 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons) (CR)
August 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Judge John H. Chun added. (CR)
July 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER re #2 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Brad Banias for Plaintiff Yash Kamat by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d). (JWC)
July 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Brad Banias FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Yash Kamat (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-8106137 (Upadhyay, Kripa)
July 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Receipt # AWAWDC-8106078) Attorney Kripa Upadhyay added to party Yash Kamat(pty:pla) filed by Yash Kamat. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit FOIA Documents, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(Upadhyay, Kripa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kamat v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yash Kamat
Represented By: Brad Banias
Represented By: Kripa Upadhyay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Represented By: Michelle R. Lambert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?