Bungie Inc v. Fisher et al
Bungie, Inc. and Bungie Inc |
Jacob Mahuron, Matthew Abbott, David Hastings, Travers Rutten, Jesse Watson, Officer, LPD John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3, John Doe 4, John Doe 5, John Doe 6, John Doe 7, John Doe 8, John Doe 10, Joshua Fisher, PragmaticTax, Nova, J, Travers, jessewatson, calc, Cypher, Khaleesi, god, c, lelabowers, Framework, Sequel, John Doe 9, Sinister, John Does 11-50, Jacob W Mahuron and John Doe 1 |
2:2023cv01143 |
August 1, 2023 |
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Michelle L Peterson |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 Summonses Electronically Issued as to defendants Matthew Abbott, Jacob W Mahuron (Attachments: #1 Summons Mahuron)(TF) |
Filing 17 PRAECIPE TO ISSUE SUMMONS for Matthew Abbott a/k/a Nova by Plaintiff Bungie Inc (Varas, Christopher) |
Filing 16 PRAECIPE TO ISSUE SUMMONS for Jacob W. Mahuron a/k/a PragmaticTax by Plaintiff Bungie Inc (Varas, Christopher) |
![]() |
Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice #9 by attorney Thomas Dean Neville will not be processed at this time. Attorney must first complete all requirements for PHV admission via PACER. Please contact Admissions Clerk Jesse Curry at 206-370-8439 or #jesse_curry@wawd.uscourts.gov with additional questions. (Ad hoc Attorney Thomas Dean Neville) (JWC) |
![]() |
Filing 13 REPORT (2 of 2) on the filing or determination of an action. Mailed to the US Copyright Office (JWC) |
Filing 12 REPORT (1 of 2) on the filing or determination of an action. Mailed to the US Copyright Office (JWC) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 9 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Thomas Dean Neville FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Bungie Inc (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-8109655 (Varas, Christopher) |
Filing 8 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Dylan M. Schmeyer FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Bungie Inc (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-8109648 (Varas, Christopher) |
Filing 7 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Michael David Dunford FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Bungie Inc (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-8109640 (Varas, Christopher) |
Filing 6 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Akiva M. Cohen FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Bungie Inc (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-8109628 (Varas, Christopher) |
Filing 5 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Complaint. ***Action Required*** Copyright/Patent/Trademark Forms Omitted.See attached letter for more information and instructions. (JWC) |
Filing 4 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Joshua Fisher (JWC) |
Hon. Michelle L. Peterson added. (JWC) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Sony Interactive Entertainment, Inc. for Bungie, Inc.. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1). Filed by Bungie, Inc.. (Varas, Christopher) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Related Case(s) 2:21-cv-01111-TL, 2:21-cv- 01114-TL, by Plaintiff Bungie, Inc.. (Varas, Christopher) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR (1) COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, (2) CIVIL RICO VIOLATIONS, (3) DMCA VIOLATIONS, (4) CFAA VIOLATIONS, (5) BREACH OF CONTRACT, (6) INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE WITH CONTRACTUAL RELATIONS AND (7) CIVIL CONSPIRACY against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # AWAWDC-8108373) filed by Bungie, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Varas, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.