Nunez Torres v. Walmart Stores Inc
| Juan Nunez-Torres and Juan Nunez Torres |
| Walmart Inc. and Walmart Stores Inc |
| 2:2023cv01155 |
| August 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| John C Coughenour |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER granting Parties' #14 Stipulated MOTION for Dismissal. All claims against Walmart are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs and/or attorney fees as to any party. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (SS)
|
| Filing 14 Stipulated MOTION for Dismissal, filed by Defendant Walmart Stores Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Stipulated Motion to Dismiss) Noting Date 9/27/2023, (DeMass, Stacy) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Settlement by Defendant Walmart Stores Inc (DeMass, Stacy) |
| Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER REASSIGNING CASE by Clerk Ravi Subramanian.. Case reassigned to U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour for all further proceedings. Hon. Michelle L. Peterson no longer assigned to case. (SNP) |
| Filing 11 DEMAND for JURY TRIAL by Defendant Walmart Stores Inc (DeMass, Stacy) |
| Filing 10 VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS by Defendant Walmart Stores Inc (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(DeMass, Stacy) |
| Filing 9 DIVERSITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 7.1(a)(2). Filed by Walmart Stores Inc. (DeMass, Stacy) |
| Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1). Filed by Walmart Stores Inc. (DeMass, Stacy) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Edward M Silverman on behalf of Defendant Walmart Inc. (Silverman, Edward) |
| Filing 6 LETTER from Clerk re receipt of case from King County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (CR) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Notice of Removal. ***Action Required*** Improper Signature - Secondary Attorney(s).See attached letter for more information and instructions. (cc: ad hoc atty Silverman's email) (CR) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT TO A US MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DECLINATION OF CONSENT FORM. Each party will be deemed to have knowingly and voluntarily consented to proceed before a Magistrate Judge if this form is not returned by 8/11/2023. Please Note: Forms must not be electronically filed with the Court. (AQ) |
| NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1), DEFENDANT must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 8/11/2023. If applicable, a Diversity Disclosure Statement may be required pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(2). In order to properly notify the Court, use the event Corporate/Diversity Disclosure Statement located in CM/ECF under Other Filings, Other Documents. (CR) |
| Hon. Michelle L. Peterson added. (CR) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Stacy Lynn Reynee DeMass on behalf of Defendant Walmart Inc.. (DeMass, Stacy) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION of Stacy DeMass re #1 Notice of Removal by Defendant Walmart Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B, #2 Exhibit C, #3 Exhibit D)(DeMass, Stacy) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from King County Superior Court, case number 23-2-11274-1; (Receipt # AWAWDC-8110253) filed by Walmart Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint)(Silverman, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
