Moriarty v. Port of Seattle
Kathleen Moriarty |
Port of Seattle |
2:2023cv01209 |
August 9, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
Tana Lin |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 JOINT STATUS REPORT signed by all parties. Estimated Trial Days: 3-4 days. (Phillips, Shannon) |
Filing 11 ORDER denying Plaintiff's #9 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Tana Lin. (SS) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) |
Filing 10 LETTER to Shannon Phillips by Kathleen Moriarty. (SS) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time, filed by Plaintiff Kathleen Moriarty. Noted for 9/22/2023. (SS) |
Filing 8 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT by Judge Tana Lin. FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 9/29/2023, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 10/13/2023, Joint Status Report due by 10/27/2023. (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) (KMP) |
Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER (text only) made at the direction of Judge Tana Lin: The Court has posted Chambers Procedures at #https://www.wawd.uscourts.gov/judges/lin-procedures. All counsel and unrepresented ("pro se") parties are DIRECTED to review them, if they have not already done so. Failure to follow the requirements set forth in the Chambers Procedures may result in the imposition of sanctions. (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) (KMP) |
Filing 6 STANDING ORDER REGARDING 28 U.S.C. 455 AND CANON 3 OF THE CODE OF CONDUCT FOR UNITED STATES JUDGES by Judge Tana Lin. (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) (KMP) |
Filing 5 VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS by Defendant Port of Seattle (Phillips, Shannon) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint; by Port of Seattle.(Phillips, Shannon) |
Filing 3 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. Joint Status Report due by 10/13/2023, FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 9/29/2023, and Initial Disclosure Deadline is 10/13/2023. (BWY) |
Judge Tana Lin added. Judge Thomas S. Zilly no longer assigned to case. (MG) |
Filing 2 LETTER from Clerk re receipt of case from King County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (MG) |
Judge Thomas S. Zilly added. (MG) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from King County Superior Court, case number 23-2-11476-1 SEA; (Receipt # AWAWDC-8118640) filed by Port of Seattle. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Phillips, Shannon) (Attachment 2 replaced on 8/10/2023 to flatten malformed PDF) (KB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Moriarty v. Port of Seattle | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kathleen Moriarty | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Port of Seattle | |
Represented By: | Shannon E Phillips |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.