Milton et al v. American Medical Systems Inc et al
| Kenneth Milton and Josephine Milton |
| American Medical Systems Inc and Boston Scientific Corp |
| 2:2023cv01251 |
| August 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Barbara J Rothstein |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
REPLY, filed by Defendant Boston Scientific Corp, TO RESPONSE to #7 MOTION to Dismiss (Jensen, Jessica)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 10/18/2023, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 10/25/2023, Joint Status Report due by 11/1/2023. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (NAW)
|
|
Filing 8
RESPONSE, by All Plaintiffs, to #7 MOTION to Dismiss . (Malling, Karl)
|
|
MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to the Standing Order for Civil Cases Setting Trial Date, Related Dates, and Court Procedures ("Standing Order") (Dkt. No. #5 ), the Court HEREBY STRIKES the noting date for the Defendant's motion (Dkt. No. #7 ). Instead, pursuant to Section II.A. 3 of the Standing Order, the opposition to the motion is due twenty-one (21) days after the date on which the motion was filed and the reply is due fourteen (14) days after the opposition is filed. This Minute Order does not strike the motion; rather, it strikes the noting date. The Court will consider the motion upon the completion of briefing in accordance with the foregoing schedule. In the future, the Court expects the parties to comply with the terms of the Standing Order. Authorized by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (SB)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Defendant Boston Scientific Corp. Noting Date 9/22/2023, (Jensen, Jessica) Modified on 8/29/2023 (SB).
|
|
MINUTE ORDER (text only) The Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. #6 , is hereby stricken with leave to refile, for failure to comply with the Certification of Conferral requirement set forth in the Court's Standing Order, ECF No. #5 , section II(F). Authorized by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (MJV)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Defendant Boston Scientific Corp. Noting Date 9/15/2023, (Jensen, Jessica)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER FOR ALL CIVIL CASES by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. The procedures in this Order supplement, and in some cases, supersede the local rules. The parties are responsible for being familiar with the procedures in this Order. Failure to comply with the procedures may result in sanctions. (NAW)
|
|
Filing 4
LETTER from Clerk re receipt of case from Snohomish County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (CR)
|
|
Judge Barbara J. Rothstein added. (CR)
|
|
Filing 3
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1). Filed by Boston Scientific Corp. (Jensen, Jessica)
|
|
Filing 2
VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS by Defendant Boston Scientific Corp (Jensen, Jessica)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Snohomish County Superior Court, case number 23-2-05814-31; (Receipt # AWAWDC-8127181) Attorney Jessica B Jensen added to party Boston Scientific Corp(pty:dft) filed by Boston Scientific Corp. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit State Court Docket, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Jensen, Jessica)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
