Hashimi v. Mayorkas et al
| Abdul Hameed Hashimi |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Ted Kim and Danielle Leyman |
| 2:2023cv01348 |
| August 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Robert S Lasnik |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT AND EARLY SETTLEMENT signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. Joint Status Report due by 11/3/2023. (VE)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Michelle R. Lambert on behalf of Defendants Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Ted Kim, Danielle Leyman, Alejandro Mayorkas. (Lambert, Michelle) |
| Filing 2 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Ted Kim, Danielle Leyman, Alejandro Mayorkas (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons) (CR) |
| Judge Robert S. Lasnik added. (CR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Receipt # AWAWDC-8146948) Attorney Jane Marie O'Sullivan added to party Abdul Hameed Hashimi(pty:pla) filed by Abdul Hameed Hashimi. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons)(O'Sullivan, Jane) (Attachment 1 replaced on 9/5/2023 due to malformed PDF) (CDA). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
