Forsman v. Port of Seattle et al
| Raymond A Forsman |
| Port of Seattle, Ray Giometti and Kelly Lyles |
| 2:2023cv01394 |
| September 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The Court hereby FINDS and ORDERS that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. This case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SB) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
|
| Filing 6 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (IFP Granted) filed by Raymond A Forsman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (SB) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting Plaintiff's #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Court recommends review by the assigned District Judge under 28 U.S.C. 1915 (e)(2)(B). Signed by Hon. S. Kate Vaughan. (SB) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
|
| Filing 4 STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Raymond A Forsman. (SB) |
| Filing 3 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment. filed by Raymond A Forsman cc mailed to Plaintiff via USPS (MG) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis before Judge S. Kate Vaughan filed by Raymond A Forsman. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit) (MG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
