Koudis v. AtmosFX Inc
Plaintiff: Nick Koudis
Defendant: AtmosFX Inc. and AtmosFX Inc
Case Number: 2:2023cv01694
Filed: November 6, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: Kymberly K Evanson
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 4, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of case by Plaintiff Nick Koudis (Rothman, Joel)
November 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Counsel having notified the Court of settlement of this case, and it appearing that no issue remains for the Court's determination, IT IS ORDERED that this action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED without prejudice and without costs to any party. Any trial date and pretrial dates previously set are hereby VACATED and any pending motion is hereby STRICKEN. In the event that settlement is not perfected, any party may move to reopen the case within sixty (60) days of the date of this order. Signed by District Judge Kymberly K. Evanson. (DS)
November 21, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE of Settlement by Plaintiff Nick Koudis (Rothman, Joel)
November 13, 2023 Filing 6 SERVICE OF SUMMONS and Complaint returned executed upon defendant AtmosFX Inc on 11/8/2023 (Rollin, Matthew)
November 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STANDING ORDER REGARDING 28 U.S.C. 455(b)(2) AND CANON 3(C)(1)(B) OF THE CODE OF CONDUCT FOR UNITED STATES JUDGES by District Judge Kymberly K. Evanson. (DS)
November 7, 2023 Filing 4 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant AtmosFX Inc (CR)
November 7, 2023 Filing 3 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Complaint,. ***Action Required*** Jury Demand Improperly Indicated.See attached letter for more information and instructions. (CR)
November 7, 2023 Filing 2 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action. Mailed to the US Copyright Office. (cc: Form to US Copyright Office via USPS) (CR)
November 7, 2023 District Judge Kymberly K. Evanson added. (CR)
November 6, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Copyright Infringement - Injunctive Relief Demanded against defendant(s) AtmosFX Inc. with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # AWAWDC-8230867) Attorney Joel Benjamin Rothman added to party Nick Koudis(pty:pla) filed by Nick Koudis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Registration, #2 Exhibit 2 - Infringement, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons, #5 Report on Copyrights (AO Form 121))(Rothman, Joel) Modified on 11/7/2023 strike jury demand (CDA).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Koudis v. AtmosFX Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nick Koudis
Represented By: Joel Benjamin Rothman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AtmosFX Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AtmosFX Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?