Smart Apparel US Inc v. Nordstrom Inc
| Smart Apparel (US) Inc. and Smart Apparel US Inc |
| Nordstrom, Inc and Nordstrom Inc |
| 2:2023cv01754 |
| November 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Theresa L Fricke |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1). Filed by Nordstrom, Inc. (Perez, David) |
| Filing 5 VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS re #1 Notice of Removal, by Defendant Nordstrom, Inc (Perez, David) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Plaintiff re #1 Notice of Removal, ; filed by Defendant Nordstrom, Inc. (Perez, David) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of David A. Perez re #1 Notice of Removal, by Defendant Nordstrom, Inc (Perez, David) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION of David A. Perez re #1 Notice of Removal, by Defendant Nordstrom, Inc (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Perez, David) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from King County Superior Court, case number 23-2-20096-9 SEA; (Receipt # AWAWDC-8243626) Attorney David A. Perez added to party Nordstrom, Inc(pty:dft) filed by Nordstrom, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint)(Perez, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
