GS Holistic LLC v. MD PRO INC et al
| GS Holistic, LLC and GS Holistic LLC |
| MD PRO INC doing business as Vape Line, Walid Hassan and Dianna Elmoussa |
| 2:2023cv01777 |
| November 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| James L Robart |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Dianna Elmoussa, Walid Hassan, MD PRO INC. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons) (RE) |
| Filing 3 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action. Emailed to the US Patent and Trademark Office. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (RE) |
| Judge James L. Robart added. (RE) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1). Filed by GS Holistic, LLC. (Harris, Brett) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Receipt # AWAWDC-8247729) Attorney Brett C Harris added to party GS Holistic, LLC(pty:pla) filed by GS Holistic, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Report on Patents and Trademarks (AO Form 120))(Harris, Brett) (Attachment 1 replaced on 11/27/2023 due to malformed PDF) (CDA). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
