Valve Corporation v. Zaiger LLC et al
| Valve Corporation |
| Zaiger, LLC, John Doe Corporation and Zaiger LLC |
| 2:2023cv01819 |
| November 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| John H Chun |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 REPLY, filed by Defendant Zaiger LLC, TO RESPONSE to #9 MOTION to Dismiss (Kestle, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 21 DECLARATION of Blake Marks-Dias filed by Plaintiff Valve Corporation re #9 MOTION to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Redacted), #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C (Redacted), #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E (Redacted), #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G (Redacted))(Marks-Dias, Blake) |
| Filing 20 RESPONSE, by Plaintiff Valve Corporation, to #9 MOTION to Dismiss . Oral Argument Requested. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Marks-Dias, Blake) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE that the following is RE-NOTED: #9 MOTION to Dismiss . Filed by Defendant Zaiger LLC. Noting Date 1/12/2024, (Kestle, Jeffrey) |
Filing 18
ORDER re #15 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Alexander C Banzhaf for DEFENDANT Zaiger LLC, by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(MG)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER re #14 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Gregory O Tuttle for DEFENDANT Zaiger LLC, by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(MG)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER re #13 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Alexa DePierro for DEFENDANT Zaiger LLC, by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(MG)
|
| Filing 15 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Alexander Banzhaf FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendant Zaiger LLC (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-8271282 (Kestle, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 14 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Gregory Tuttle FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendant Zaiger LLC (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-8271270 (Kestle, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 13 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Alexa DePierro FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendant Zaiger LLC (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-8271240 (Kestle, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1). Filed by Valve Corporation. (Marks-Dias, Blake) |
| Filing 11 DECLARATION of Jeffrey Zaiger in Support of Defendant Zaiger LLC's Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Zaiger LLC re #9 MOTION to Dismiss (Kestle, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 10 DECLARATION of Jeffrey Kestle in Support of Defendant Zaiger LLC's Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Zaiger LLC re #9 MOTION to Dismiss (Kestle, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Defendant Zaiger LLC. Oral Argument Requested. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 1/12/2024 12/29/2023, (Kestle, Jeffrey) Modified noting date on 12/15/2023 (SB). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Related Case(s) 2:21-cv-00563-JCC, by Defendant Zaiger LLC. (Kestle, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 7 LETTER from Clerk re receipt of case from King County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (RE) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Filing Deficiency ***Action Required*** Notice of Related Cases Omitted. See attached letter for more information and instructions. Notice of Related Case must be filed by 12/5/2023. (RE) |
| NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1), Plaintiff Valve Corporation must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 12/7/2023. If applicable, a Diversity Disclosure Statement may be required pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(2). In order to properly notify the Court, use the event Corporate/Diversity Disclosure Statement located in CM/ECF under Other Filings, Other Documents. (RE) |
| Judge John H. Chun added. (RE) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1). Filed by Zaiger, LLC. (Kestle, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Plaintiff re #1 Notice of Removal ; filed by Defendant Zaiger, LLC. (Kestle, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 3 VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS re #1 Notice of Removal by Defendant Zaiger, LLC (Kestle, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION of Jeffrey Kestle in Support of Defendant Zaiger, LLC's Notice of Removal re #1 Notice of Removal by Defendant Zaiger, LLC (Kestle, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from King County Superior Court, case number 23-2-20436-1 SEA; (Receipt # AWAWDC-8254521) filed by Zaiger, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Complaint)(Kestle, Jeffrey) (Attachment 1 replaced on 12/1/2023 due to malformed PDF) (CDA). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
