Brabrook v. CDM Smith et al
Plaintiff: Caroline Brabrook
Defendant: CDM Smith, Douglas Lavoie, Daniel Manojlovski and Douglas A Lavoie
Case Number: 2:2024cv00016
Filed: January 4, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: Tana Lin
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 15, 2024 Notice of Re-Setting Deadline(s) re Parties' #11 Notice/Stipulation. Pursuant to section III(A) of Judge Lin's Standing Order, the FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 3/18/2024, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 4/1/2024, Combined Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan due by 4/15/2024. (MJV)
February 14, 2024 Filing 11 STIPULATION TO REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES by parties (Danzberger, Diana)
February 13, 2024 Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION to Withdraw Document Motion to increase number of IRFPs, filed by Plaintiff Caroline Brabrook. Noting Date 2/23/2024, (Lonnquist, Judith)
February 13, 2024 ***Motions terminated by Clerk re Plaintiff's #9 MOTION to Suppress Motion to increase number of IRFPs and Plaintiff's #10 Unopposed MOTION to Withdraw Document Motion to increase number of IRFPs. Pursuant to LCR 7(l), "[a] moving party may withdraw its own pending motion by filing a Notice to Withdraw Pending Motion". No further briefing or Court order is required per LCR 7(l). (MJV)
February 8, 2024 Filing 9 MOTION to Suppress Motion to increase number of IRFPs, filed by Plaintiff Caroline Brabrook. Noting Date 2/23/2024, (Lonnquist, Judith)
January 19, 2024 Filing 8 DEMAND for JURY TRIAL by Plaintiff Caroline Brabrook (MJV)
January 18, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT by Judge Tana Lin. FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 2/15/2024, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 2/29/2024, Joint Status Report due by 3/14/2024. (KMP)
January 18, 2024 Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER (text only) made at the direction of Judge Tana Lin: The Court has posted Chambers Procedures at #https://www.wawd.uscourts.gov/judges/lin-procedures. All counsel and unrepresented ("pro se") parties are DIRECTED to review them, if they have not already done so. Failure to follow the requirements set forth in the Chambers Procedures may result in the imposition of sanctions. (KMP)
January 18, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STANDING ORDER REGARDING 28 U.S.C. 455 AND CANON 3 OF THE CODE OF CONDUCT FOR UNITED STATES JUDGES by Judge Tana Lin. (KMP)
January 10, 2024 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) re: #1 Notice of Removal, by CDM Smith, Daniel Manojlovski, Douglas A Lavoie.(Demmon, Nicole)
January 9, 2024 Filing 3 LETTER from Clerk re receipt of case from Pierce County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (MG)
January 9, 2024 Judge Tana Lin added. (MG)
January 5, 2024 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1). Filed by CDM Smith, Daniel Manojlovski, Douglas Lavoie. (Demmon, Nicole)
January 4, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from King County, case number 23-2-23698-0; (Receipt # AWAWDC-8300731) filed by Douglas Lavoie, CDM Smith, Daniel Manojlovski. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplement Declaration of Nicole Demmon, #4 Exhibit Declaration of Nicole Demmon, #5 Exhibit Declaration of Nicole Demmon, #6 Exhibit Declaration of Nicole Demmon, #7 Supplement Declaraton of Beth Cowling)(Demmon, Nicole)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brabrook v. CDM Smith et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Caroline Brabrook
Represented By: Judith A Lonnquist
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CDM Smith
Represented By: Diana P Danzberger
Represented By: Nicole E. Demmon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Douglas Lavoie
Represented By: Diana P Danzberger
Represented By: Nicole E. Demmon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Manojlovski
Represented By: Nicole E. Demmon
Represented By: Diana P Danzberger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Douglas A Lavoie
Represented By: Diana P Danzberger
Represented By: Nicole E. Demmon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?