Ristvet et al v. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
| Phyllis Ristvet, Camie Martin and Julia Kuhn |
| Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center |
| 2:2024cv00019 |
| January 4, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| John H Chun |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Case consolidated per #2 Notice of Related Cases. All papers filed in the Consolidated Action shall be filed under 2:23-cv-01893-JHC, the case number assigned to the first-filed case. (SB) |
Filing 4
MINUTE ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge John H. Chun for all further proceedings. Judge James L. Robart no longer assigned to case. Authorized by Judge James L. Robart. (SS)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center (CR) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Related Case(s) 2:23-cv-01893-JHC, 2:23-cv-01916-JLR, 2:23-cv-01998-JLR, 2:23-cv-01988-KKE, by All Plaintiffs. (Stephens, Kim) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT , CLASS ACTION against defendant(s) FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER CENTER with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # AWAWDC-8301585) filed by JULIA KUHN, PHYLLIS RISTVET, CAMIE MARTIN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Stephens, Kim) |
| Judge James L. Robart added. (CR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
