Gargar v. Thompson
| Abdulkadir Osman Gargar |
| State of Washington and Mark Thompson |
| 2:2024cv00128 |
| January 29, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tiffany M Cartwright |
| Grady J Leupold |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER denying Petitioner's #10 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Grady J Leupold.(MW) (cc: Petitioner via USPS)
|
| Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Court recommends the Petition (Dkt. #5 ) be DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. No evidentiary hearing is necessary and a certificate of appealability should be denied. The parties shall have fourteen (14) days from service of this report to file written objections. The Clerk is directed to set the matter for consideration on 4/12/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Grady J Leupold. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proposed Judgment)(MW) (cc: Petitioner via USPS) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE, by Respondent Mark Thompson, to #10 MOTION to Appoint Counsel. (Sonntag, Holger) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, filed by Petitioner Abdulkadir Osman Gargar. Noted by Clerk for 3/22/2024. (MW) |
| Filing 9 STATE COURT RECORD filed by Respondent Mark Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10)(Sonntag, Holger) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE to #5 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Respondent Mark Thompson. Noting Date 3/22/2024, (Sonntag, Holger) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Holger Sonntag on behalf of Respondent Mark Thompson. (Sonntag, Holger) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER FOR SERVICE, ANSWER, AND SUBSTITUTION OF RESPONDENT, 2254 PETITION. The Clerk of Court is directed to SUBSTITUTE Mark Thompson as the Respondent in this action. The Clerk shall arrange for service, by first class mail upon Respondent and by e-mail upon the Attorney General of the State of Washington, of copies of the Petition, any other documents filed in support of the Petition, and this Order. ( #5 Petition and this Order mailed to Thompson, emailed to Attorney General on 2/16/2024) Signed by Magistrate Judge Grady J Leupold. (Attachments: #1 Pro Se Instruction Sheet)(MW) (cc: Petitioner via USPS)
|
| Filing 5 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Receipt # IFP Granted) filed by Abdulkadir Osman Gargar.(MW) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting Petitioner's #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Grady J Leupold.(MW)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis before Judge Grady J. Leupold filed by Abdulkadir Osman Gargar. (per filing, Petitioner is now at Western State Hospital) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus)(MW) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Proposed 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. ***Action Required*** 2241/2254 Filing Fee Not Paid.See attached letter for more information and instructions. Filer has until 3/1/2024 to correct IFP application (Attachments: #1 IFP Form) (AMD) (cc: Petitioner via USPS) |
| Filing 1 PROPOSED 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Petitioner Abdulkadir Osman Gargar. (No Filing Fee or IFP Application) (Attachments: #1 Trust Statement, #2 Mailing Envelope)(AMD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
