Yanny et al v. Grimm Collections et al
Plaintiff: Jessica Yanny and Clancy Moody
Defendant: Grimm Collections and Landmark Credit Union
Case Number: 2:2024cv00150
Filed: February 5, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: Marsha J Pechman
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of case by All Plaintiffs (Anderson, Jason)
February 26, 2024 ***Civil Case Terminated, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), per the filing of Plaintiffs' #5 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Case. (KRA)
February 14, 2024 Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1). Filed by Grimm Collections. (Hasson, Jeffrey)
February 7, 2024 Filing 3 Notice of Filing Deficiency re #1 Notice of Removal. ***Action Required*** Pro Hac Vice Admission.See attached letter for more information and instructions. cc Attorney Brian Becker via US Mail(CDA)
February 7, 2024 Filing 2 LETTER from Clerk re receipt of case from King County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (RE)
February 7, 2024 Judge Marsha J. Pechman added. (RE)
February 7, 2024 NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1), Defendant Grimm Collections must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 2/14/2024. If applicable, a Diversity Disclosure Statement may be required pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(2). In order to properly notify the Court, use the event Corporate/Diversity Disclosure Statement located in CM/ECF under Other Filings, Other Documents. (RE)
February 5, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from King County Superior Court, case number Unfiled; (Receipt # AWAWDC-8339845) filed by Grimm Collections. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hasson, Jeffrey)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Yanny et al v. Grimm Collections et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica Yanny
Represented By: Thomas Tyler Santiago
Represented By: Jason D Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clancy Moody
Represented By: Jason D Anderson
Represented By: Thomas Tyler Santiago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Grimm Collections
Represented By: Jeffrey I Hasson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Landmark Credit Union
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?