Vasudevan et al v. Progressive Home Advantage et al
Vishal Thanvantri Vasudevan and Sai Srujana Buddi |
Progressive Home Advantage, Homesite Insurance Company, Joseph Dijulio, Jane Doe Dijulio and Does I-V |
2:2024cv00235 |
February 21, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Lauren King |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 RECEIPT by King County Superior Court of #10 Remand Letter to State Court. (SS) |
Filing 10 LETTER to King County Superior Court Remanding Case to State Court. (SS) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting Parties' #8 Stipulated MOTION For Remand to Superior Court. The above-captioned case is REMANDED to the Superior Court for King County in the State of Washington. The Clerk of the Court shall CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Lauren King. (SS) |
Filing 8 Stipulated MOTION For Remand to Superior Court, filed by Defendants Jane Doe Dijulio, Joseph Dijulio, Homesite Insurance Company, Progressive Home Advantage. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 3/15/2024, (Knapp, Dylan) |
Filing 7 DEMAND for JURY TRIAL by Defendants Jane Doe Dijulio, Joseph Dijulio, Homesite Insurance Company, Progressive Home Advantage (Knapp, Dylan) |
Filing 6 CORPORATE AND DIVERSITY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent American Family Insurance Mutual Holding Company, Other Affiliate Homesite Group Incorporated, Other Affiliate AMFAM, Inc., Other Affiliate American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I., Other Affiliate Homesite Underwriting Manages LLC for Homesite Insurance Company. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1) and (2). Filed by Homesite Insurance Company, Progressive Home Advantage. (Knapp, Dylan) |
Filing 5 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT. FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 3/28/2024, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 4/11/2024, Joint Status Report due by 4/25/2024. Signed by Judge Lauren King. (NAW) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER FOR ALL CIVIL CASES. The procedures in this Order supplement, and in some cases, supersede the local rules. The parties are responsible for being familiar with the procedures in this Order. Failure to comply with the procedures may result in sanctions. Signed by Judge Lauren King. (NAW) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER REGARDING 28 U.S.C. 455(b)(2) AND CANON 3(C)(1)(B) OF THE CODE OF CONDUCT FOR UNITED STATES JUDGES by Judge Lauren King. (NAW) |
Filing 2 LETTER from Clerk re receipt of case from King County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. JURY DEMAND - properly submitted state court jury demand on file (CR) |
Judge Lauren King added. (CR) |
NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1), DEFENDANT(S) must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 3/1/2024. If applicable, a Diversity Disclosure Statement may be required pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(2). In order to properly notify the Court, use the event Corporate/Diversity Disclosure Statement located in CM/ECF under Other Filings, Other Documents. (CR) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from King County Superior Court, case number 23-2-25453-8; (Receipt # AWAWDC-8360027) Attorney Dylan R Knapp added to party Jane Doe Dijulio(pty:dft) filed by Progressive Home Advantage, Homesite Insurance Company, Joseph Dijulio, Jane Doe Dijulio. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Exhibit A-G)(Knapp, Dylan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.