Boards of Trustees of the Cement Masons & Plasterers Health & Welfare Trust et al v. Mass Excavation Inc
| Boards of Trustees of the Cement Masons & Plasterers Health & Welfare Trust, Cement Masons and Plasterers Retirement Trust and Western Washington Cement Masons Journeyman and Apprentice Training Trust |
| Mass Excavation, Inc. and Mass Excavation Inc |
| 2:2024cv00292 |
| March 4, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| John H Chun |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Mass Excavation, Inc. (Receipt # AWAWDC-8374998) Attorney Noelle E Dwarzski added to party Boards of Trustees of the Cement Masons & Plasterers Health & Welfare Trust(pty:pla), Attorney Noelle E Dwarzski added to party Cement Masons and Plasterers Retirement Trust(pty:pla), Attorney Noelle E Dwarzski added to party Western Washington Cement Masons Journeyman and Apprentice Training Trust(pty:pla) filed by Boards of Trustees of the Cement Masons & Plasterers Health & Welfare Trust, Western Washington Cement Masons Journeyman and Apprentice Training Trust, Cement Masons and Plasterers Retirement Trust. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Dwarzski, Noelle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
