Letts et al v. Washington CVS Pharmacy LLC et al
| Jacob Letts and Aleks Letts |
| Washington CVS Pharmacy LLC, CVS Pharmacy Inc, CVS Health Corporation, CVS Care Concierge LLC, CVS Caremark Advanced Technology Pharmacy LLC, John/Jane Does 1-10 and John and Jane Does 1-10 |
| 2:2024cv00313 |
| March 7, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| John H Chun |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
|
|
| Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge John H. Chun for all further proceedings. Judge David W. Christel no longer assigned to case, by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. (KAM) |
| Filing 9 VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS re #1 Notice of Removal,, by Defendants CVS Care Concierge LLC, CVS Caremark Advanced Technology Pharmacy LLC, CVS Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy Inc, Washington CVS Pharmacy LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Documents previously filed in State Court)(Banerjee, Nabeena) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Address/Change of Name of Attorney Geraldine Anne T Enrico. Filed by Defendants CVS Care Concierge LLC, CVS Caremark Advanced Technology Pharmacy LLC, CVS Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy Inc, Washington CVS Pharmacy LLC. (Enrico, Geraldine) |
| Filing 7 DEMAND for JURY TRIAL by Defendants CVS Care Concierge LLC, CVS Caremark Advanced Technology Pharmacy LLC, CVS Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy Inc, Washington CVS Pharmacy LLC (Banerjee, Nabeena) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT TO A US MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DECLINATION OF CONSENT FORM. Each party will be deemed to have knowingly and voluntarily consented to proceed before a Magistrate Judge if this form is not returned by 3/21/2024. Please Note: Forms must not be electronically filed with the Court. (KEB) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) re: #1 Notice of Removal,, by CVS Care Concierge LLC, CVS Caremark Advanced Technology Pharmacy LLC, CVS Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy Inc, Washington CVS Pharmacy LLC.(Banerjee, Nabeena) |
| Filing 4 LETTER from Clerk re receipt of case from King County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (RE) |
| Judge David W. Christel added. (RE) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent CVS Health Corporation for CVS Care Concierge LLC, CVS Caremark Advanced Technology Pharmacy LLC, CVS Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy Inc, Washington CVS Pharmacy LLC. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1). Filed by All Defendants. (Banerjee, Nabeena) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION of Melanie St. Angelo re #1 Notice of Removal, by Defendants CVS Care Concierge LLC, CVS Caremark Advanced Technology Pharmacy LLC, CVS Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy Inc, John/Jane Does 1-10, Washington CVS Pharmacy LLC (Banerjee, Nabeena) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from King County Superior Court, case number 24-2-02975-3; (Receipt # AWAWDC-8381082) filed by Washington CVS Pharmacy LLC, John/Jane Does 1-10, CVS Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy Inc, CVS Care Concierge LLC, CVS Caremark Advanced Technology Pharmacy LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit State Court Summons, #3 Exhibit State Court Notice of Appearance, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Banerjee, Nabeena) (Attachment 4 replaced on 3/13/2024 due to malformed PDF) (CDA). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.