Hill v. Les Schwab Tire Centers of Washington LLC et al
| Jeffrey Hill |
| Les Schwab Tire Centers of Washington, LLC |
| 2:2024cv00425 |
| March 28, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 DECLARATION of Kyle D. Nelson re #1 Notice of Removal by Defendant Les Schwab Tire Centers of Washington, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-F)(Nelson, Kyle) |
| Filing 5 DEMAND for JURY TRIAL by Plaintiff Jeffrey Hill (Emery, Timothy) |
| Filing 4 VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS re #1 Notice of Removal Declaration of Charles Eberhardt by Defendant Les Schwab Tire Centers of Washington, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-E)(Nelson, Kyle) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Bethany Graham re #1 Notice of Removal by Defendant Les Schwab Tire Centers of Washington, LLC (Nelson, Kyle) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF re #1 Notice of Removal ; filed by Defendant Les Schwab Tire Centers of Washington, LLC. (Nelson, Kyle) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from King County Superior Court, case number 24-2-05117-1 SEA; (Receipt # BWAWDC-8408879) filed by Les Schwab Tire Centers of Washington, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Nelson, Kyle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
