Khalid et al v. Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff: Atm Shafiqul Khalid and Xencare Software Inc
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation
Case Number: 2:2024cv00449
Filed: April 3, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: Jamal N Whitehead
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 4, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER re #5 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Irene I Yang for DEFENDANT Microsoft Corporation, by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(MG)
April 4, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER re #4 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Gina F Elliott for DFEFENDANT Microsoft Corporation, by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(MG)
April 4, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER re #3 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Erin Bernstein for DEFENDANT Microsoft Corporation, by Clerk Ravi Subramanian. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(MG)
April 4, 2024 Filing 8 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action. Emailed to the US Patent Office. (KS)
April 4, 2024 Filing 7 LETTER from Clerk re receipt of case from King County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. JURY DEMAND - properly submitted state court jury demand on file (KS) (cc attorneys Bernstein, Elliot, and Yang via ad hoc)
April 4, 2024 NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1), Xencare Software Inc must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 4/11/2024. If applicable, a Diversity Disclosure Statement may be required pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(2). In order to properly notify the Court, use the event Corporate/Diversity Disclosure Statement located in CM/ECF under Other Filings, Other Documents. (KS)
April 4, 2024 Judge Jamal N Whitehead added. (KS)
April 3, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE of Related Case(s) 2:19-cv-00130; 2:24-cv-00448, by Defendant Microsoft Corporation. (Bradley, Heidi)
April 3, 2024 Filing 5 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Irene Yang FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendant Microsoft Corporation (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-8417339 (Bradley, Heidi)
April 3, 2024 Filing 4 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Gina Elliott FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendant Microsoft Corporation (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-8417338 (Bradley, Heidi)
April 3, 2024 Filing 3 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Erin Bernstein FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendant Microsoft Corporation (Fee Paid) Receipt No. AWAWDC-8417337 (Bradley, Heidi)
April 3, 2024 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1(a)(1). Filed by Microsoft Corporation. (Bradley, Heidi)
April 3, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with State Court JURY DEMAND by Plaintiff attached as separate document; from King County Superior Court, case number 19-2-02755-0; (Receipt # AWAWDC-8417287) Attorney Heidi B Bradley added to party Microsoft Corporation(pty:dft) filed by Microsoft Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint, #2 Jury Demand, #3 Exhibit C - Mason Report, #4 Exhibit D - Cragun Report, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Report on Patents and Trademarks (AO Form 120))(Bradley, Heidi) (Attachment 5 replaced on 4/4/2024 due to malformed pdf) (KS).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Khalid et al v. Microsoft Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Atm Shafiqul Khalid
Represented By: Mark P Walters
Represented By: Mitchell D West
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Xencare Software Inc
Represented By: Mark P Walters
Represented By: Mitchell D West
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation
Represented By: Erin Bernstein
Represented By: Gina F Elliott
Represented By: Irene I Yang
Represented By: Heidi B Bradley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?